Talk:Margaret Waterfield
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Century[[edit source]]
Well, it seems probable that we're getting rid of this type of category, anyway, but how can this person be a 20th century individual? Her sister died in the early 1860s. Victoria was born in 1852. I mean I know it's theoretically possible she made it to the 1900s, but she would have been quite elderly by then. Surely she'd primarily be considered a 19th century individual. (See why these categories are stupid?)
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 17:40:18 Sun 13 Mar 2011
- The story Birthright is partly set in 1909, which is why I put her down as a 20th century individual. I'll change it if it is wrong though. Mini-mitch\talk 18:01, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
You could only base it of the Birthright date if it was "date active". She's over nine years old so I would definitely change it to 18th century.----Skittles the hog--Talk 18:11, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
