Talk:Who Peter (documentary)

Delete

I strongly disagree with the prop delete on this article. This is a completely legitimate topic for an article. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 19:24, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

• I think it's up for deletion, more because there's so little information on it. If the user had created the page with more structure and put on it the fact it is a stub, then yes, I could understand the objection, but we can't have a page that just has the information which it has right now on it. The Thirteenth Doctor 19:50, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yes. I put it up for deletion as it probably doesn't even deserve a stub tag due to the little amount of information on it. If anyone can add more information, the template should be removed. User:Solar Dragon/Signature 20:23, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, but that's not really what the delete tag is for. Deletion should be used for articles which do not meet the notability criterion for inclusion or which are topics that are so far ahead of their public release that there is doubt as to the accuracy of even the name of the article. A stub is precisely what this article is: a valid topic with little information. Deleting a valid topic means that when it's recreated there will then be a message saying "this article was previously deleted, are you sure you want to create it?", which can be off-putting to people who are legitimately trying to create it. A stub tag, by contrast, says "Help make this wisp of an article better." CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 21:48, June 16, 2010 (UTC)