User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200905235227/@comment-6032121-20200905235907
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
…Must we create a new debate every time a new user (one who didn't even sign their comment!) gets their facts wrong? If somebody goes on on Talk:The Night of the Doctor (TV story) and says "huh, that doesn't look like it's set in the regular continuity to me, because the regeneration effect is weird," would that be cause for a Night of the Doctor inclusion debate?
You're the first one to say that inclusion debates are tiresome, even moreso to close than to participate in. I don't see why you saddle all of us (including yourself!) with this when it's just a matter of a question on a talk page.
