User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170306172600/@comment-1432718-20170311223548

OttselSpy25 wrote: People aren't posting in the thread because there's not much else to say -- even those who have agreed have simply said "I agree" before they've moved on.

There are probably lots of reasons why people aren't posting in the thread: real life issues; lack of familiarity with Tardis:Valid sources; general fatigue over the massive number of validity threads in the last few months; etc. etc. etc.

Even you, the first person to challenge anything that I've said, are posting not in disagreement with the thread but with me wanting to close the thread. You clearly didn't have anything to add to the actual debate, or else you would have posted something about these three stories. You are, in a sense, proof that there are people who are reading this thread who haven't posted simply because they don't disagree with it. They feel that if their opinion has already been said, they have no real reason to post. So we're waiting for someone to disagree so that we can make the forum long enough to justify setting a precedent.

Don't put words in my mouth or claim that my actions mean something specific. You may be sure I am very well aware how little my contributions are wanted on these validity threads. That is the only reason I'm not posting my opinion. However, as an admin I do have a responsibility to make sure the rules are followed.

One last thing. The definition of "unanimous" is "(of two or more people) fully in agreement." So if five people take part in a debate and five people agree then it's pretty unanimous.

Sure, five out of five on this thread are unanimous but you five users are not the entirety of this wiki. Like I posted above, two of the five haven't even bothered to register on this wiki.