User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-27280472-20160606210324/@comment-27280472-20161108163302

Shambala108 wrote:

SOTO wrote: I really think Forum:Inclusion debate: Death Comes to Time says it all.

"Don't waste other editors' time by opening up discussions that are materially the same as other, concluded discussions. You may open up discussions on matters that have already been decided only when you have arguments which have not formed a part of that discussion, or other, precedent discussions on the same topic."

Please carefully read through Forum:Inclusion debate: Death Comes to Time, and if you have any arguments that are not already covered in that debate, post them here; otherwise this discussion will be closed by the above quoted policy.

As I said at the start of this thread, I have read the inclusion debate. I'm not "wasting other editors' time" because a) you're under no obligation to be involved and so can only waste your own time, and b) what I'm saying here was not discussed in the inclusion debate. I never said "Death Comes to Time should be treated as equally valid as Survival" (though that is true), I said that this wiki would cover its subject better if it allowed information from DCtT in an "alternate universe" capacity.