User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-43908-20150311013943/@comment-6032121-20181105172233

There's no doubt that both Romanas are meant as the third incarnation of Romana. The problem is that they are meant as different third incarnations of Romana — like if the Ninth Doctor and Shalka Doctor were both valid, if you will — and not everyone agrees that they should go on the same page.

…Also, isn't there some mixed-up business about "Trey" only being given as the name of an avatar in the Matrix who resembled the "other Romana III" but wasn't her, and thus would be deserving of a page which would occupy the "Trey" page?… I seem to recall an unresolved issue of that nature upthread.