User talk:Neosforce657

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Welcome to the
Site-logo.png
• Neosforce657 •

Thanks for your recent edits! I'm Jimbo, your robot wiki representative! We hope you'll keep on editing with us. This is actually a great time to have joined, because we're now fully independent, and working on a host of new features!

We've got a couple of important quirks for a fan written wiki, so let's get them out of the way first.

British English, please

We generally use British English 'round these parts, so if you use another form of English, please be sure you set your spell checker to BrEng, and take a gander at our spelling cheat card.

Spoilers aren't cool

We have a strict definition of "spoiler" that you may find a bit unusual. Basically, a spoiler, to us, is anything that comes from a story which has not been released yet. So, even if you've got some info from a BBC press release or official trailer, it basically can't be referenced here. In other words, you gotta wait until the episode has finished its premiere broadcast to start editing about its contents. Please check the spoiler policy for more details.

Other useful stuff

Aside from those two things, we also have some pages that you should probably read when you get a chance, like:

If you're brand new to wiki editing — and we all were, once! —  you probably want to check out these tutorials at Wikipedia, the world's largest wiki:

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes like this:
~ ~ ~ ~

Thanks for becoming a member of the TARDIS crew! If you have any questions, see the Help pages, add a question to one of the Forums or ask an admin.


Sources[[edit source]]

Please cite sources when adding material to article pages. As users will often want to check where the information is from. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 16:24, April 16, 2010 (UTC)


It's not lies. The info is from http://www.whoisdoctorwho.co.uk/ which was created by the BBC who create Doctor who thus it is real. Please don't delete it.

The issue was it wasn't sourced and was inserted into the article somewhat haphazardly. Also there is an issue of verifiability, many of the things on the whoisdoctorwho website are referring to TV stories where we can double check this information with 'what actually happened'. But I'm not so sure about the info you added as it doesn't appear to be referring to TV or prose stories.
The Ninth Doctor article already has an external link out to the page where this information is cited, which I think presents the information in context better than trying to integrate these second hand accounts into the body of the text. Thanks. --Tangerineduel 16:50, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

True true but these events happened to the ninth doctor during his life. They should be written in both places. In the unrecored adventures part. Stop deleting them please. I'm only trying to make a positive contribution.Also the information on the who is doctor who? website is a kind of back story but loads of short back-stories of people's sightings of the Doctor. It doesn't neccesarily have to refer to a TV episode. Comics don't but that info should be added and the new series adventures some of those are mentioned in the series. But please let me re-add it.

Quotes and MOS[[edit source]]

the Manual of Style has changed, which was not made well-known so why you may not know. Quotes are to to fitted into the article, not at the top of it, the quote has to to relative to the article, e.g. descriptive. All Television articles had their quotes removed from the top of the page, and we are currently going through all the monster, aliens, villains, characters etc and removing the quote from them. I would ask you to wait till we finished doing this, before putting qoute into the article, under the headings, and must be relevant. Sorry for the inconvenience, and if your still unsure, please see the MOS or ask an admin. See here for details. Mini-mitch 21:21, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Images on articles[[edit source]]

Hi, we've updated our Manual of Style concerning the use of images on in-universe articles. In short only screenshots should be used on in-universe articles as promotional images or concept art is often staged and not within an in-universe setting. Thanks. Tangerineduel

Your recent addition to the Tenth Doctor article was rolled back as the image did not conform to our Manual of Style relating to image use. Please do not add images that are contrary to our image use for articles policy. --Tangerineduel 13:52, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

That's a very silly regulation.


The policy was discussed by the active members of this wiki who are striving to create a unique encyclopaedia made up of the best sources whilst maintaining an in-universe style that is constant across all the articles on this wiki. --Tangerineduel 13:59, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
Oh no no no right but they still do it on the Star wars wikia and it works for them.I actually think the character main images are better against a plain background.
You have silly regulations, and this is TARDIS Wikia, not Star Wars Wiki. Here we disaprove of promotional images on articles. The is against our Manual of Style. If you do not understand here are the main two languages in the world apart from English. Duelfight, 18:36, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Vous avez des règlements stupides, et c'est TARDIS Wikia, pas de Star Wars Wiki. Ici, nous disaprove des images promotionnelles sur les articles. L'l'encontre de notre Manual of Style.

Usted tiene reglamentos tonto, y esto es TARDIS Wikia no, Star Wars Wiki. Aquí disaprove de las imágenes promocionales de artículos. El está en contra de nuestro Manual de Estilo.

I'm just asking but why do you disaprove of promotional images or images against colour backgrounds? It works really well I think so why don't we use it? Neosforce657 12:31, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Quoted from the discussion on the forums: Never, ever use publicity stills — except as temporary, pre-broadcast placeholders – because they're out-of-universe, and have no place on an in-universe article page Mini-mitch 13:35, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
I know that but other wikis use them and it works fine for them. So why not here? Neosforce657 12:44, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
The choice was made here to not use promotional stills. Some wikis choose to use them, others try to avoid them. This one avoids them wherever possible. -- sulfur 12:53, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Yes it does try to avoid them but why? They work so well. Neosforce657 13:01, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Because we want to have in-universe images, not out-of-universe articles. We decided it was better for this wiki and also we decided it looked better. Is that difficult to understand. That is why we did it. Mini-mitch 14:04, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Basically, we write all articles from the point of view of some sort of entity at the very end of the universe. We only use images of things that actually happened in Doctor Who. That's why promo pics are no use on main article pictures; there's no way a Dalek would pose in front of a green screen for a picture. You see? --The Thirteenth Doctor 13:18, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys I need help. I started a wik the Slave Leia wiki and need contributors. http://slaveleia.wikia.com/wiki/Slave_Leia_Wiki Please help me with it. Thanks. Neosforce657 17:43, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Last Words[[edit source]]

Please stop removing the code as it is messing up the page. The Thirteenth Doctor 09:25, September 28, 2010 (UTC)


Three things.


One - Those weren't the Master's last words they were - Get out of the way! You did this to me! All my life! You made me! one two three FOUR...


Two - We don't even know if he's dead so these can't be his last words.


Three - He didn't regenerate probably and I think we should remove his last words from "The end of time" until we know whether he regenerated after attacking Rassilon.

  • I didn't say don't remove the Master's last words. I asked you to stop removing the coding. --The Thirteenth Doctor 09:57, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oh sorry didn't realise I was. But the Master's last and first words from "The end of time" should be deleted until we next see the Master. Neosforce657 09:58, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Images[[edit source]]

You've been asked before not to use promotional images. Please do not do so again. --The Thirteenth Doctor 19:25, October 3, 2010 (UTC)


It works better. I'd like to speak to someone and try to get both promo and on-screen accepted. Just whichever works best for the select article. So who do I speak to about it?Neosforce657 19:46, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

  • You would have to bring it up at the forums, here, but I have to say, it is likely pointless as all articles are to be in-universe, and they can't be in-universe if you add out-of-universe pictures to them. You can try and have this changed, but it is unlikely to be changed as you'd need the support of a lot of users, and I think most of the regular users would actually oppose it. --The Thirteenth Doctor 20:02, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Final warning about images[[edit source]]

You've been asked several times by users and an admin not to use promotional images on this wiki. You've asked where you can bring this up, yet you did not and simply continued to add them. If you do so again, I will ask an admin to step in and warn you. The Thirteenth Doctor 22:57, October 5, 2010 (UTC)


I've added a new image non-promotional! Give the man a medal! Please don't ban this new image of the Tenth Doctor in his Tuxedo in The Lazarus experiment. The shot is from after Lazarus is reverted to human form tempoarily before the Doctor gets slapped.

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff />   20:41: Tue 20 Dec 2011 

Christmas cheer[[edit source]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png