Talk:Twelfth Doctor/Non-valid sources: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Okay, great. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]] 17:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC) | ::Okay, great. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]] 17:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::Buuuuuuuuut it's a big deal and we didn't discuss it before so let's have some discussion with other people. Just my 2 cents. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC) | :::Buuuuuuuuut it's a big deal and we didn't discuss it before so let's have some discussion with other people. Just my 2 cents. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::Also, [[Sutekh/Non-valid sources]] is in Non-DWU Individuals, so that could be precedent? [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]] 17:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:24, 9 June 2023
Categories?
Should this be in Category:Non-DWU individuals, Category:Non-DWU Doctors etc, or should these subpages have their own category? Aquanafrahudy 📢 16:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Interesting question, I don't think we ever addressed if categories should be placed on our new subpages. LoA pages have categories, so there's some precedent there, but I don't think that this subpage really works with prior categories. Probably invent new ones? Najawin ☎ 16:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, great. Aquanafrahudy 📢 17:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Buuuuuuuuut it's a big deal and we didn't discuss it before so let's have some discussion with other people. Just my 2 cents. Najawin ☎ 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Also, Sutekh/Non-valid sources is in Non-DWU Individuals, so that could be precedent? Aquanafrahudy 📢 17:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Buuuuuuuuut it's a big deal and we didn't discuss it before so let's have some discussion with other people. Just my 2 cents. Najawin ☎ 17:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, great. Aquanafrahudy 📢 17:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
