Forum:Real world franchises with DWU connections: Qualification speedround: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* '''Every franchise that appears in ''[[Funko Pop! Blitz (video game)|Funko Pop! Blitz]]'''''. A couple of months back, somebody went to that sizeable list of represented franchises at the bottom of the page there, and turned each one into an inactive link, with the clear intention for franchise pages to be created. …I went in and removed the links. The thing is, I'm not entirely sure if it counts as a crossover, when the full extent of their connection to ''Doctor Who'' is "characters from this franchise and ''Doctor Who'' sometimes appear on the game board at the same time" | * '''Every franchise that appears in ''[[Funko Pop! Blitz (video game)|Funko Pop! Blitz]]'''''. A couple of months back, somebody went to that sizeable list of represented franchises at the bottom of the page there, and turned each one into an inactive link, with the clear intention for franchise pages to be created. …I went in and removed the links. The thing is, I'm not entirely sure if it counts as a crossover, when the full extent of their connection to ''Doctor Who'' is "characters from this franchise and ''Doctor Who'' sometimes appear on the game board at the same time" | ||
* '''''LEGO Dimensions'' franchises that don't appear with DW elements in any narrative elements'''. Do we really need a page for, let's say, ''The Powerpuff Girls'', on the basis that "you can play as | * '''''LEGO Dimensions'' franchises that don't appear with DW elements in any narrative elements'''. Do we really need a page for, let's say, ''The Powerpuff Girls'', on the basis that "the Doctor and the Cyberman are among the dozens and dozens of characters you can play as while visiting Townsville"? | ||
* '''''[[Shrek (series)|Shrek]]'''''. This one actually already has a page, as you can see, I'm not 100% sure if it actually qualifies due to a unique grey area that's presented: ''Shrek'' was involved in BBC One's 2012 Christmas campaign, ''[[It's Showtime (TV story)|It's Showtime]]''. Now, in terms of the campaign as a whole, Shrek himself does appear in one of the idents, suggesting a licensing agreement that makes this an official usage. But when it comes to the promo, the thing that we actually cover due it its usage of DW elements, Shrek's appearance is only ''implied''; he's presented as apparently being inside a trailer at the BBC studio, where he shoots a large blob of green snot from offscreen. Would you say that counts as an "appearance"? | * '''''[[Shrek (series)|Shrek]]'''''. This one actually already has a page, as you can see, I'm not 100% sure if it actually qualifies due to a unique grey area that's presented: ''Shrek'' was involved in BBC One's 2012 Christmas campaign, ''[[It's Showtime (TV story)|It's Showtime]]''. Now, in terms of the campaign as a whole, Shrek himself does appear in one of the idents, suggesting a licensing agreement that makes this an official usage. But when it comes to the promo, the thing that we actually cover due it its usage of DW elements, Shrek's appearance is only ''implied''; he's presented as apparently being inside a trailer at the BBC studio, where he shoots a large blob of green snot from offscreen. Would you say that counts as an "appearance"? | ||
Revision as of 22:45, 29 June 2023
Index → The Panopticon → Real world franchises with DWU connections: Qualification speedround
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Simply put: deciding what franchises qualify for our ever-growing collection of pages that connect with the DWU in some form or another, as it's not always immediately apparent.
To start with:
- Every franchise that appears in Funko Pop! Blitz. A couple of months back, somebody went to that sizeable list of represented franchises at the bottom of the page there, and turned each one into an inactive link, with the clear intention for franchise pages to be created. …I went in and removed the links. The thing is, I'm not entirely sure if it counts as a crossover, when the full extent of their connection to Doctor Who is "characters from this franchise and Doctor Who sometimes appear on the game board at the same time"
- LEGO Dimensions franchises that don't appear with DW elements in any narrative elements. Do we really need a page for, let's say, The Powerpuff Girls, on the basis that "the Doctor and the Cyberman are among the dozens and dozens of characters you can play as while visiting Townsville"?
- Shrek. This one actually already has a page, as you can see, I'm not 100% sure if it actually qualifies due to a unique grey area that's presented: Shrek was involved in BBC One's 2012 Christmas campaign, It's Showtime. Now, in terms of the campaign as a whole, Shrek himself does appear in one of the idents, suggesting a licensing agreement that makes this an official usage. But when it comes to the promo, the thing that we actually cover due it its usage of DW elements, Shrek's appearance is only implied; he's presented as apparently being inside a trailer at the BBC studio, where he shoots a large blob of green snot from offscreen. Would you say that counts as an "appearance"?
- The aforementioned campaign brings up a similar question in regard to Disney and Pixar's Up. It's an "official" part of the campaign via one of the idents (Carl's house is seen flying past the screen), but its only usage in the actual promo is the appearance of a bunch of live action balloons that are only said to be from Up.
… On a semi-related note: we need to standardise what the dab term should be. I myself am guilty of not being consistent in that regard, alternating between "series" and "franchise". But we should probably pick one to stick with.
WaltK ☎ 22:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
