Forum:Adding "part of" to LOAs: Difference between revisions
Tag: 2017 source edit |
JSmith5504 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::: Does look quite nice. I'm not sure about extending its use to something broader like "[Publisher]'s [X]th anniversary releases" or the like, though; I think that's if anything closer to a series than an anthology, it's a different meaning of "part of" altogether. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 22:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC) | ::: Does look quite nice. I'm not sure about extending its use to something broader like "[Publisher]'s [X]th anniversary releases" or the like, though; I think that's if anything closer to a series than an anthology, it's a different meaning of "part of" altogether. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 22:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::: Support this! Would propose switching the "Series" and "Part of" columns around — that would make most of the table go roughly* from "specific" to "broad" as you go from left to right, and I think that'd be more intuitive. (The currently proposed ordering is also ''particularly'' confusing for things like ''[[Short Trips (anthology)|Short Trips]]'' and ''[[The Tenth Doctor Chronicles (audio anthology)|The Tenth Doctor Chronicles]]'', which share a name with the series they're a part of.) | |||
:::: *It occasionally happens that a work is classified by the wiki as part of a series while the anthology it's published in ''isn't'' (see ''[[Horrors of Arcbeatle (anthology)|Horrors of Arcbeatle]]'' for examples), but most of the time — in my experience — they match up. | |||
:::: [[User:JSmith5504|jsmith5504]]<sup>[[User talk:JSmith5504|talk to me]]</sup> 10:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:11, 2 April 2024
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
OP
Just a simple little one today, I'll try and keep it quick.
Right, so, when creating lists of appearances, note we have a column for "series", but we really ought to have a column for if it's part of an anthology or something as well. Currently, the workaround is either to make the "series" section span multiple rows, and have the anthology or whatever as part of that, or, if the anthology is part of a specific series, to place it after the series with a colon. This is a very messy situation, and to remedy it I propose a new column, "part of". An example of how this might work can be seen at User:Aquanafrahudy/LOA proposal.
Sorry about not being terribly eloquent, but there you are.
Thanks for reading, Aquanafrahudy 📢 🖊️ 17:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Discussion
I like your proposed layout- feels much more natural and easier to read. I support your proposal. -User:ThetaSigmaEarChef
- For another example, please see User:Aquanafrahudy/Coloth/Appearances. Aquanafrahudy 📢 🖊️ 11:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the example. I support this idea too. Very helpful. — Fractal Doctor @ 21:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Does look quite nice. I'm not sure about extending its use to something broader like "[Publisher]'s [X]th anniversary releases" or the like, though; I think that's if anything closer to a series than an anthology, it's a different meaning of "part of" altogether. Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 22:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support this! Would propose switching the "Series" and "Part of" columns around — that would make most of the table go roughly* from "specific" to "broad" as you go from left to right, and I think that'd be more intuitive. (The currently proposed ordering is also particularly confusing for things like Short Trips and The Tenth Doctor Chronicles, which share a name with the series they're a part of.)
- *It occasionally happens that a work is classified by the wiki as part of a series while the anthology it's published in isn't (see Horrors of Arcbeatle for examples), but most of the time — in my experience — they match up.
- jsmith5504talk to me 10:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
