Talk:Cyberman: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
 
(153 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==To-Do List of articles to split off the main==
{{subpage tabs}}
{{ArchCat}}


*Variants (photos/pictures, which stories each variants appeared in, "personality", voices)
== ‘Merged Cyber-Race’ ==
Now we know that at some point the Cybusmen were merged with the original ones, shouldn’t the Pandorica, Good Man, Closing Time, and Blood Cybermen be moved to a third section named ‘Merged Cyber-Race’ or something, with the Nightmare Cybermen been part of this section or a new one? {{SUBST:User:Kingofall42/SigReal|{{SUBST:{''Predated ''}}}}. 09:23, May 14, 2013 (UTC)


*History (also, a list of all Cyber-stories with known dates)
== Joint Cybermen ==
Why was this removed we now know that at one point in their history, both the Mondasian and Cybus Cybermen encountered each other. What actually happened is unknown although they did co-operate and shared their technologies, to give birth to the variant of cyberman seen in A Good Man Goes to War, the video-game Blood of the Cybermen, Closing Time, Nightmare in Silver, and possibly The Pandorica Opens.


*List of appeareances (fill in gaps in the list and give own separate page)
==Too Borg-like?==
The latest version of the Cybermen ("Nightmare in Silver") seems to be very Borg, with frequent adaptation ("upgrade in progress") instead of the old-style ones where you never saw them do the upgrades.


--[[User:***Stardizzy***|***Stardizzy***]] 11:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this current version more powerful than the Daleks now?


== Reference ==
Probably close, but the daleks would probably win, but we don't know for now.


There's a good referance book that describes the whole history of the cybermen, not incorporating Silver Nemesis - "CYBERMEN" by David Banks (ISBN 0-352-32738-3). <u>[[User:ToaBionicle|Smi]][[User Talk:ToaBionicle|th]]</u>. 18:29, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
-- [[Special:Contributions/65.94.76.126|65.94.76.126]]<sup>[[User talk:65.94.76.126#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:49, May 21, 2013 (UTC)


== Cyberman terminology ==
== Joined Cybermen ==


At the time of writing this there are some errors in captioning on photos on the Cyberman page. To avoid misinterpretation and/or some kind of edit war I will try and explain this as clearly as possible.
http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/gaiman-on-upgrading-the-cybermen-48926.htm, have the mondasian and cybus crossed?


== JOINT CYBERMEN OR CYBUS CYBERMEN ==
In The Pandorica Opens Cybermen are seen twice and Cyberships are seen. The ships and the fact that the first Cyberman we saw as a guard had new features unseen to Cybus Cybermen before, along with a whole skull, proves this is a new variant of Cybermen even though they have Cybus Logos. Moffat has stated it before and evidence backs up the idea that after The Next Doctor a second group survived and joined with an unknown group of Mondas Cybermen forming a new variant of Joint Cybermen as seen, in an early form, in PO. These Cybermen choose to use Mondas tech with Cybus armor, but didnt get rid of the Cybus logo till later on in there timeline.{{Unsigned-anon|173.63.41.232}}
:It's an interesting way to look at it, but I think a bit speculative. It could just as easily be that the Cybermen in ''Pandorica Opens'' were Cybus who had upgraded their technology a bit — the line "all universes will be deleted" to justify their being part of the Alliance ''does'' suggest they're from Pete's World, to me. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:49, July 14, 2019 (UTC)
::[[Tardis:Discussion policy]] prohibits speculation on article talk pages. Please refrain from further speculation on this page thanks [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:16, July 14, 2019 (UTC)


== "Cybermen of unknown origin" ==


: '''Issue 1 : Use of photo with term "Original Cyberman / Cybermen"'''
"Cybermen of unknown origin"
It's pretty clear, especially in Nightmare in Silver, that these are upgraded Mondasian Cybermen. [[Special:Contributions/62.254.12.55|62.254.12.55]]<sup>[[User talk:62.254.12.55#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:48, December 8, 2013 (UTC)


: '''Issue 2 : Description of photos of various Cyberman designs caption as being Mark ...'''
== Their development ==
I'd like to know how the Cybermen managed to improve themselves to the point of Nightmare In Silver. I mean, as the Tenth Doctor said to John Lumic, they're stripping themselves from imagination, and that's what they need to progress. However, with their wars with the Human Empire, they've improved themselves gradually to the point they became almost invincible to humans. How did they even manage to do so without imagination? --[[User_talk:X29|X29]] 17:15, August 4, 2014 (UTC)
:If you want to know specifically how they improved themselves, I don't know if that information is available in any stories yet. If you just want a general discussion based on your last question, you must take it to [[Howling:The Howling]], as that kind of discussion isn't allowed on talk pages per [[Tardis:Discussion policy]]. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:23, August 14, 2014 (UTC)


::I just wanted answers, yeesh... --[[User_talk:X29|X29]] 15:24, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
==Why is this page "Cyberman" rather than "Cybermen"?==
It's true that this is in accord with general Wiki policy, but prior to the merging, the pages were [[Cybermen (Mondas)]] and [[Cybermen (Pete's World)]]. Why not keep the same exception? I assume it was for ease of linking, and in this instance that does seem like a strong reason to me — 90 percent of the time we'll be linking to Cybermen rather than Cyberman, and unlike with [[Dalek]], you can't just tack on an S at the end and let Wikia do the rest… --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:19, June 28, 2019 (UTC)


:Except in certain circumstances, which this does not fall into, all article names (including species names) are singular. I don't know why the original two were made plural and I never actually noticed it till now. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 14:07, June 28, 2019 (UTC)


'''Issue 1 :'''''' Use of photo with term "Original Cyberman / Cybermen"'''
== 5.3 Factual correction ==


Considering that we never find out when exactly in Mondas’ history the colony ship was built and sent, along with the fact that the events there took place over thousands of years, shouldn’t we place it under the ‘Undated events’ section? It would make more sense, especially for pages like this where we’re dealing with Cybermen as a whole, not just individuals.
[[User:CyberFoundries900|CyberFoundries900]] [[User talk:CyberFoundries900|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:35, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
: In my opinion, any attempt a linear Cybermen timeline is pretty much voided by ''The Doctor Falls''’s explanation that Cybermen get started at various points in time and space  as an inevitable risk of human-like civilizations. I think what we ought to do is have an "Origins" section with subsections by planet. For lack of any hard facts on in which order these origins happened, we could default to listing them in the order that the Doctor encountered them. It would go something like:
:: <small><nowiki>==</nowiki> Origins <nowiki>===</nowiki></small>
:: <small><nowiki>===</nowiki> On Mondas <nowiki>===</nowiki></small>
:: <small><nowiki>===</nowiki> On Telos <nowiki>===</nowiki></small>
:: <small><nowiki>===</nowiki> On Marinus <nowiki>===</nowiki></small>
:: <small><nowiki>===</nowiki> In Pete's World <nowiki>===</nowiki></small>
:: <small><nowiki>===</nowiki> On the Mondasian Colony Ship <nowiki>===</nowiki></small>
: What does everyone else think? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:51, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
That sounds like it could work, so long as said format is used only for an origins section. I’d also move the info on Rise of the Cybermen/The Age of Steel and the games after them to the ‘alternate universes’ category as they occur in a separate universe to the other origins. Also it wouldn’t be too hard to edit seeing as most of the origins are placed early in the history section. I asked the question mainly to know how to arrange info of the history sections for the pages on general Cybermen topics, such as the Cyber-Lieutenant page (do I place the info from Alit in Underland, which takes place on the colony ship, before the other sections or after, for example).
[[User:CyberFoundries900|CyberFoundries900]] [[User talk:CyberFoundries900|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:10, October 16, 2019 (UTC)


== More variants in the infobox gallery? ==
Should there be more images added to the infobox? "N-Space" is a very broad term, and there have been multiple variants and designs. And then there are the likes of the more recent Cyber-Masters... should they be included too? — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Send a space-time telegraph">@</span>]] 15:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


Earlier today the infobox photo had an Invasion Cyberman (Mk. IV - see below) with the caption "Original Cyberman". I altered this to read "Cyberman (Our Universe)" on the grounds that the Mk. IV from the Invasion may well be an early Cyberman, but it is not the "original" design (Mk. I from the Tenth Planet). This was rapidly changed back (I think by an un-named editor). Later on the photo was changed to show some Silver Nemesis Cybermen (Mk. VII) but retaining the title "Original Cybermen".
: I think that is a good idea. Any suggestions for said images? {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 17:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


In-keeping with the two we already have, I've tried to find some good screencaps to represent different models. [Gallery below.] The Mondasian one is facing left, and the majority of the core features are in frame (hollow eyes, cloth face, headlamp, chest unit). I found the ''Moonbase/Tomb'' ones trickier, as we're yet to have any good quality screencaps (ie. upscaled HD) but I've proposed one showing off the Cyber-controller with regular Cyberman in the background.


The one I've proposed for the ''Earthshock ''variants (are they called Cyber-scouts? Do they all have unique names?) is the one I'd argue most to use - not only does it show off a Cyber-Leader and a Cyberman, but I think it's a very clear shot of the designs and it also just so happens to feature them in a recognisable (arguably iconic) set ["Destroy them at once!"]


To avoid pointlesslsy confusing people I feel that one of two changes should be made. Either :
''Attack'', I've found similar. A Cyber-controller with a Cyberman in Cyber HQ on Telos, both of them decently in frame. Even though the regular Cyberman design is the same as the one in ''Earthshock ''(and ''Five Doctors''), the Cyber-controller is different. I don't think we need to use this one - if we start trying to find images for every single variant, it'd be never ending (the one painted black, all the tweaks made over the years to various costumes, etc). The one I've found for'' Silver Nemesis'' is annoyingly lowish quality, but again shows a Cyber-Leader with a regular Cyberman in good profile. I'd argue these should be included over the ''Attack ''ones if only because they are noticably different now - cricket gloves, new overalls, chrome-finish for the helmets.


Of the ones I've suggested for the classic series, the one I'd most like to see is the one I've plucked from ''Earthshock''. The others are just suggestions and I daresay there are probably better frames that others could grab that show off the Cybermen better.


(Also worth asking at this point, should we stick to official televised Cybermen only? If we start including variants from BBV and comics, for example, the gallery could go on forever.) — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Send a space-time telegraph">@</span>]] 17:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


A) Use the term "Original Cyberman/men" and show a Mk 1 Tenth Planet design
<gallery>
File:Cyber1.png
File:Cyber2.png
File:Cyber3.png
File:Cyber4.png
File:Cyber5.png
</gallery>


''Excellent.'' — [[User:FractalDoctor|Fractal Doctor]] [[User talk:FractalDoctor|<span title="Send a space-time telegraph">@</span>]] 17:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)


=== Post-fork ===


Or
Just wanted to give this idea a nudge again, post-fork. I still believe covering a few of the main design variants would work well in an infobox gallery, showcasing various design evolutions since 1966. × [[User:Fractal|Fractal]] [[User talk:Fractal|<span title="Talk">•</span>]] 10:29, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 
Seems reasonable. How would you label them? --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 
: Would we be able to label them by the year they were first introduced? Alternatively, just "A", "B", "C", etc? × [[User:Fractal|Fractal]] [[User talk:Fractal|<span title="Talk">•</span>]] 16:36, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
B) Use whatever other Cyberman design is desired but change the term "Original" to "Classic" / "Early" / "This Universe" etc.
 
 
 
The reason for this is simple; "Original" basically means "First" or "Earliest" and any design other than that of the 10th Planet is not an "Original" Cyberman. If anyone thinks otherwise please discuss.
 
 
 
'''Issue 2 : Naming types of Cyberman design. '''
 
 
 
There are several ways in which a person could categorise Cybermen in terms of Type 1,2,3 etc.
 
 
 
They could be categorised by :
 
a) Probable chronological development within a Cyberman Time Line
 
b) Historical dating of stories
 
c) The order in which the Cybermen appeared on screen (which is thus also the Doctor's Time Line)
 
 
 
Personally I think naming Cyberman designs following the order in which the Doctor encountered them / the stories were shown on screen makes the most sense as at least this deals with some degree of certainty whereas probable placement of designs within a theoertical Cyber time line is largely fan speculation and opinion. Just as importantly, it probably also makes the most sense to a casual reader or a new fan.
 
If we go with categorising the Cybermen by design changes in the order in which the Doctor encontered them we then have :
 
Mk I = Tenth Planet
 
Mk II = Moonbase / Tomb of the Cybermen
 
Mk III = Wheel in Space
 
Mk IV = Invasion
 
Mk V = Revenge of the Cybermen
 
Mk VI = Earthshock, 5 Doctors & Attack of the Cybermen (unless anyone wishes to subdivide further?)
 
Mk VII = Silver Nemesis (Only a minor change in many ways)
 
 
 
Currently the page has a photo of an Invasion type (Mk IV) Cyberman marked as being MK II, Silver Nemesis (Mk VII) Cybermen unmarked by type, another Invasion Cyberman (Mk IV) refered to as a Mk III (twice), a Earthshock/5 Doctors/Attack type (Mk VII) tagged as being Mk IV (twice), some un-categorised Moonbase (Mk II) Cybermen, a Tomb Cyberman correctly tagged as Mk II, and some Revenge Cybermen (Mk VI) marked as Mk III. Personally I regard most of these as being mistakes for the reasons given above but even if some other categorisation method is being used it is not being applies consistently e.g. both Invasion and Tomb Cybermen being tagged as Mk II.
 
 
 
I propose edit the Cyberman entry in accordance with the above categorisation method for Cyberman types, and to change the term "Original" Cyberman to "Classic Cyberman". If anyone objects to this or wishes to change things back, please explain the reasoning rather than just editing.
 
[[User:Mr Pepperpot|Mr Pepperpot]] 00:54, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Cybermen or Cybusmen in Blood of the Cybermen ==
 
I remeoved this text :
 
 
 
"Cybermen will appear again in Blood of the Cyberman, as part of episode 2 of Doctor Who The Adventures games starring Matt Smith and Karen Gillan. This marks 21 years since the last time the original cybermen have appeared in Doctor Who.Cybermen will appear again in Blood of the Cyberman, as part of episode 2 of Doctor Who The Adventures games starring Matt Smith and Karen Gillan. This marks 21 years since the last time the original cybermen have appeared in Doctor Who.Cybermen will appear again in Blood of the Cyberman, as part of episode 2 of Doctor Who The Adventures games starring Matt Smith and Karen Gillan. This marks 21 years since the last time the original cybermen have appeared in Doctor Who."
 
 
 
I removed this on the grounds the game has not yet been released, thus far we don't know if the Cybermen in the game are from this universe or are Pete's World cybermen, but that all pre-release images suggest they are modified Cybus design cybermen. I think it would be better to wait a few days until the game is released before making any such statements.
 
 
 
In addition, the original Cybermen have not appeared ON TV since Silver Nemesis, but they have appeared in other media, including the BBC broadcast 8th Dr audios, so the statement is rather less than clear.
 
 
 
[[User:Mr Pepperpot|Mr Pepperpot]] 16:15, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
 
:So, ''Blood of the Cybermen'' is out, and we still don't have any answers. In ''The Pandorica Opens'' we learn that the Cybus Cybermen somehow still got into our universe, and are now a sea-faring race. The game doesn't make it clear exactly which the Doctor is dealing with.--[[User:Samoth|Samoth]] 16:14, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
:
:Space faring....... not see faring [[User:Fan555|Fan555]] 17:45, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
:I propose a merge. In The Next Doctor, the walls between Mondas and Pete's Cybermen was blurred and Blood of the Cybermen and The Pabdorica Opens have certainly strengthened that becasue we don't know which version they are. I'm australian, so I havent played Blood yet, but from what Ive read, it isnt said that they're Mondas Cybermen. The fine line that used to be drawn between the two species has been cut up. This is why i think they should be merged. I'm A Hydroponic Tomato! [[User:Bigredrabbit|Bigredrabbit]] ('''[[User talk:Bigredrabbit|talk to me]]''') 03:48, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
:
:It's just stupid to label them Mondasian Cybermen when they're unconfirmed...the logo is a potential indication but it is not an evidence...cybermats are definitely NOT evidence, since the Cybus Cybermen's technology advances significantly everytime we meet them...these cybermen should definitely be placed on both articles as unconfirmed if not merging the articles as Bigredrabbit said above...the Cybus Cybermen could very well have been the 'ancestors' of Mondasian Cybermen or any other wacky explanations...but listing unconfirmed things as facts is just plain stupid...[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 16:58, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Overview page? ==
 
How about making the main [[Cyberman]] article an overview page about all kinds of cybermen, their differences and similarities, while having the current article as a more specific article at [[Cyberman (Mondas)]] or something like that? I'm not suggesting a full merge - the details would still be in separate articles. [[User:Ausir|Ausir]]<sup>[[User talk:Ausir|(talk)]]</sup> 21:54, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:01, 24 May 2024

Archive.png
Archives: #1

‘Merged Cyber-Race’[[edit source]]

Now we know that at some point the Cybusmen were merged with the original ones, shouldn’t the Pandorica, Good Man, Closing Time, and Blood Cybermen be moved to a third section named ‘Merged Cyber-Race’ or something, with the Nightmare Cybermen been part of this section or a new one? {{SUBST:User:Kingofall42/SigReal|{{SUBST:{Predated }}}}. 09:23, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Joint Cybermen[[edit source]]

Why was this removed we now know that at one point in their history, both the Mondasian and Cybus Cybermen encountered each other. What actually happened is unknown although they did co-operate and shared their technologies, to give birth to the variant of cyberman seen in A Good Man Goes to War, the video-game Blood of the Cybermen, Closing Time, Nightmare in Silver, and possibly The Pandorica Opens.

Too Borg-like?[[edit source]]

The latest version of the Cybermen ("Nightmare in Silver") seems to be very Borg, with frequent adaptation ("upgrade in progress") instead of the old-style ones where you never saw them do the upgrades.

Is this current version more powerful than the Daleks now?

Probably close, but the daleks would probably win, but we don't know for now.

-- 65.94.76.126talk to me 13:49, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Joined Cybermen[[edit source]]

http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/gaiman-on-upgrading-the-cybermen-48926.htm, have the mondasian and cybus crossed?

JOINT CYBERMEN OR CYBUS CYBERMEN[[edit source]]

In The Pandorica Opens Cybermen are seen twice and Cyberships are seen. The ships and the fact that the first Cyberman we saw as a guard had new features unseen to Cybus Cybermen before, along with a whole skull, proves this is a new variant of Cybermen even though they have Cybus Logos. Moffat has stated it before and evidence backs up the idea that after The Next Doctor a second group survived and joined with an unknown group of Mondas Cybermen forming a new variant of Joint Cybermen as seen, in an early form, in PO. These Cybermen choose to use Mondas tech with Cybus armor, but didnt get rid of the Cybus logo till later on in there timeline.The preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.63.41.232 (talk).

It's an interesting way to look at it, but I think a bit speculative. It could just as easily be that the Cybermen in Pandorica Opens were Cybus who had upgraded their technology a bit — the line "all universes will be deleted" to justify their being part of the Alliance does suggest they're from Pete's World, to me. --Scrooge MacDuck 09:49, July 14, 2019 (UTC)
Tardis:Discussion policy prohibits speculation on article talk pages. Please refrain from further speculation on this page thanks Shambala108 14:16, July 14, 2019 (UTC)

"Cybermen of unknown origin"[[edit source]]

"Cybermen of unknown origin" It's pretty clear, especially in Nightmare in Silver, that these are upgraded Mondasian Cybermen. 62.254.12.55talk to me 00:48, December 8, 2013 (UTC)

Their development[[edit source]]

I'd like to know how the Cybermen managed to improve themselves to the point of Nightmare In Silver. I mean, as the Tenth Doctor said to John Lumic, they're stripping themselves from imagination, and that's what they need to progress. However, with their wars with the Human Empire, they've improved themselves gradually to the point they became almost invincible to humans. How did they even manage to do so without imagination? --X29 17:15, August 4, 2014 (UTC)

If you want to know specifically how they improved themselves, I don't know if that information is available in any stories yet. If you just want a general discussion based on your last question, you must take it to Howling:The Howling, as that kind of discussion isn't allowed on talk pages per Tardis:Discussion policy. Shambala108 14:23, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
I just wanted answers, yeesh... --X29 15:24, August 14, 2014 (UTC)

Why is this page "Cyberman" rather than "Cybermen"?[[edit source]]

It's true that this is in accord with general Wiki policy, but prior to the merging, the pages were Cybermen (Mondas) and Cybermen (Pete's World). Why not keep the same exception? I assume it was for ease of linking, and in this instance that does seem like a strong reason to me — 90 percent of the time we'll be linking to Cybermen rather than Cyberman, and unlike with Dalek, you can't just tack on an S at the end and let Wikia do the rest… --Scrooge MacDuck 10:19, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

Except in certain circumstances, which this does not fall into, all article names (including species names) are singular. I don't know why the original two were made plural and I never actually noticed it till now. Shambala108 14:07, June 28, 2019 (UTC)

5.3 Factual correction[[edit source]]

Considering that we never find out when exactly in Mondas’ history the colony ship was built and sent, along with the fact that the events there took place over thousands of years, shouldn’t we place it under the ‘Undated events’ section? It would make more sense, especially for pages like this where we’re dealing with Cybermen as a whole, not just individuals. CyberFoundries900 15:35, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

In my opinion, any attempt a linear Cybermen timeline is pretty much voided by The Doctor Falls’s explanation that Cybermen get started at various points in time and space as an inevitable risk of human-like civilizations. I think what we ought to do is have an "Origins" section with subsections by planet. For lack of any hard facts on in which order these origins happened, we could default to listing them in the order that the Doctor encountered them. It would go something like:
== Origins ===
=== On Mondas ===
=== On Telos ===
=== On Marinus ===
=== In Pete's World ===
=== On the Mondasian Colony Ship ===
What does everyone else think? --Scrooge MacDuck 15:51, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

That sounds like it could work, so long as said format is used only for an origins section. I’d also move the info on Rise of the Cybermen/The Age of Steel and the games after them to the ‘alternate universes’ category as they occur in a separate universe to the other origins. Also it wouldn’t be too hard to edit seeing as most of the origins are placed early in the history section. I asked the question mainly to know how to arrange info of the history sections for the pages on general Cybermen topics, such as the Cyber-Lieutenant page (do I place the info from Alit in Underland, which takes place on the colony ship, before the other sections or after, for example). CyberFoundries900 16:10, October 16, 2019 (UTC)

More variants in the infobox gallery?[[edit source]]

Should there be more images added to the infobox? "N-Space" is a very broad term, and there have been multiple variants and designs. And then there are the likes of the more recent Cyber-Masters... should they be included too? — Fractal Doctor @ 15:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I think that is a good idea. Any suggestions for said images? 17:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

In-keeping with the two we already have, I've tried to find some good screencaps to represent different models. [Gallery below.] The Mondasian one is facing left, and the majority of the core features are in frame (hollow eyes, cloth face, headlamp, chest unit). I found the Moonbase/Tomb ones trickier, as we're yet to have any good quality screencaps (ie. upscaled HD) but I've proposed one showing off the Cyber-controller with regular Cyberman in the background.

The one I've proposed for the Earthshock variants (are they called Cyber-scouts? Do they all have unique names?) is the one I'd argue most to use - not only does it show off a Cyber-Leader and a Cyberman, but I think it's a very clear shot of the designs and it also just so happens to feature them in a recognisable (arguably iconic) set ["Destroy them at once!"]

Attack, I've found similar. A Cyber-controller with a Cyberman in Cyber HQ on Telos, both of them decently in frame. Even though the regular Cyberman design is the same as the one in Earthshock (and Five Doctors), the Cyber-controller is different. I don't think we need to use this one - if we start trying to find images for every single variant, it'd be never ending (the one painted black, all the tweaks made over the years to various costumes, etc). The one I've found for Silver Nemesis is annoyingly lowish quality, but again shows a Cyber-Leader with a regular Cyberman in good profile. I'd argue these should be included over the Attack ones if only because they are noticably different now - cricket gloves, new overalls, chrome-finish for the helmets.

Of the ones I've suggested for the classic series, the one I'd most like to see is the one I've plucked from Earthshock. The others are just suggestions and I daresay there are probably better frames that others could grab that show off the Cybermen better.

(Also worth asking at this point, should we stick to official televised Cybermen only? If we start including variants from BBV and comics, for example, the gallery could go on forever.) — Fractal Doctor @ 17:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Excellent.Fractal Doctor @ 17:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Post-fork[[edit source]]

Just wanted to give this idea a nudge again, post-fork. I still believe covering a few of the main design variants would work well in an infobox gallery, showcasing various design evolutions since 1966. × Fractal 10:29, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Seems reasonable. How would you label them? --Scrooge MacDuck 15:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Would we be able to label them by the year they were first introduced? Alternatively, just "A", "B", "C", etc? × Fractal 16:36, 8 March 2024 (UTC)