Howling:List of disputed companions: Difference between revisions
m (moved List of Disputed Companions to Howling:List of disputed companions: Want to preserve this user's work, but this doesn't belong in ns:0. Impossible to write about this topic in anything other than an OOU way. Fan speculation, so, to th...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{forumheader|The Howling}} | |||
==Moved from main article space== | |||
The following was moved from the main article space to the Howling in an effort to preserve the original editor's fairly extensive work. It doesn't belong in the main article space, though, because it's pure fan speculation. There's no way to write about disputed companions from an in-universe perspective, because it's only the ''fans'' who dispute the companions; the characters themselves don't go around wondering if they're a companion of the Doctor. For a more generalised discussion about disputed companions, see also [[Forum:Disputed Companions]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''05:22:41 Tue '''31 May 2011 </span> | |||
==Original article by [[user:Dallan007]]== | |||
There are several characters whose status as a companion is disputed, even if they have been recognized by official sources. Fans have often argued for the exclusion of characters for several reasons, including lack of travel time in the TARDIS, lack of an invitation to adventure with the Doctor, appearances in only one adventure, etc. | There are several characters whose status as a companion is disputed, even if they have been recognized by official sources. Fans have often argued for the exclusion of characters for several reasons, including lack of travel time in the TARDIS, lack of an invitation to adventure with the Doctor, appearances in only one adventure, etc. | ||
Revision as of 05:22, 31 May 2011
Moved from main article space
The following was moved from the main article space to the Howling in an effort to preserve the original editor's fairly extensive work. It doesn't belong in the main article space, though, because it's pure fan speculation. There's no way to write about disputed companions from an in-universe perspective, because it's only the fans who dispute the companions; the characters themselves don't go around wondering if they're a companion of the Doctor. For a more generalised discussion about disputed companions, see also Forum:Disputed Companions.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">05:22:41 Tue 31 May 2011
Original article by user:Dallan007
There are several characters whose status as a companion is disputed, even if they have been recognized by official sources. Fans have often argued for the exclusion of characters for several reasons, including lack of travel time in the TARDIS, lack of an invitation to adventure with the Doctor, appearances in only one adventure, etc.
Below is a list of characters whose status has been disputed by fans, including those recognized as companions by official sources. For more information regarding the debate over these characters' statuses, see their individual listings.
First Doctor
Television
- Sara Kingdom (recognized by the BBC)
Second Doctor
Television
Third Doctor
Television
- The Brigadier (recognized by the BBC)
- Captain Mike Yates
- Sergeant John Benton
Fourth Doctor
Television
Fifth Doctor
Television
Sixth Doctor
Audio
Seventh Doctor
Television
Eighth Doctor
Television
Prose fiction
Ninth Doctor
Television
Tenth Doctor
Television
- Jackie Tyler
- K9 Mark III and IV
- Jenny
- Professor River Song
- Luke Smith
- Clyde Langer
- Rani Chandra
- Rosita
- Cassie Rice (recognized by the BBC)
- Jimmy Stalkingwolf (recognized by the BBC)
- Meta-Crisis Tenth Doctor
Eleventh Doctor
Television
- Nasreen Chaudhry
- Vincent Van Gogh
- Craig Owens
- Auton Rory (independence from Rory Williams debated)
- Kazran Sardick (recognized by BBC)
- Abigail Pettigrew (recognized by BBC)
- Canton Delaware
