User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
 
(198 intermediate revisions by 45 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{|align="right" style="text-align: center; border: solid 1px #CCC; margin: 20px; padding: 5px;"
<!--{| width="100%" style="background: #800080; "
|<center>[[File:Archive filingcabinent.png|50px]]</center>
| valign="top" width="50%" style="background:purple; border: 2px solid #800080; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|<h2></h2>-->
|-
{{ArchCat}}
|
'''Archives:''' [[User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor/Archive Talk|1]]


|-
==Trenzalore==
|__TOC__
Trenzalore was a place that, according to Dorium Maldovar, would be where the First Question in the Universe would be answered truthfully. The Doctor would arrive there at some point in his travels, at the fall of the Eleventh. The religious order known as the Silence was determined to ensure that the Doctor never reached Trenzalore. (DW: The Wedding of River Song) [1] History
|}


==The Full wiki==
Let's regress for a moment back to the Men in Black(MIB). According to John Keel, the MIB often state that they are representatives of the "Nation of the Third Eye."
Hey, I've just sent a message off to Wikia about it, so hopefully I should find out something soon. Thanks for letting me know. Out of curiosity how did you find "The Full Wiki"? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:43, July 17, 2010 (UTC)


==thank you==
  Based on some of the info already researched, it is
thank the thirtteenth doctor i know zythe block on yesrtday thank you and thank you of lots .


becues the night mare man page is delete i know it
apparent that Sirius has been in contact with humanity for a long time. According to George Hunt Williamson (one of the early contactees) in his book "Other Tongues, Other Flesh,"[2] the earth allies of Sirius, i.e., the secret societies, use the Eye of Horus as an insignia. This symbol has also been seen on the MIB. Secret societies believe that there is a Great White Lodge on earth. They call it Shamballa -- and consider it to be the spiritual center of the world. Now, theosophists such as Alice Bailey say that the Great White Lodge is on Sirius. If the All-Seeing-Eye is a symbol of Sirius' earth-allies and the MIB wear that symbol, and if Shamballa represents the Great White Lodge on earth -- then the MIB are emissaries of Shamballa. Sirius and Shamballa are two sides of the same coin. This is verified in the book "The Undiscovered Country,"[3] by Stephen Jenkins. Jenkins was told by Buddhist priests that Shamballa was located in the constellation of Orion.


== Reply about br ==
  The entrance to Shamballa on earth is usually placed in the


Simple for design, it looks better than have the title crammed into the infobox. It worked for 'Children of Earth' so I rolled it out onto pages that have longer titles. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 20:11, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
trans-Himalayan region. Some assert it is in the heart of the Gobi Desert (where there have been allegations of crashed disks and bases). According to the explorer Nicholas Roerich, there are caves in the Himalayas foothills that have subterranean passages. In one of the these passages, there is a stone door that has never been opened, because the time for its opening has not yet arrived. In 1930, Doreal founded the Brotherhood of the White Temple. He says that the entrance to Shamballa is far underground. he goes on to say that space bends around Shamballa, and that there is a warp which leads into another universe.


i am yoer biggest fan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do you have a little girl called alice? kayleigh wales age 8
--


== fans ==
== Thanks ==


i am yoer biggest fan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do you have a little girl called alice? kayleigh wales age 8
Thanks for that and good luck with the answers site. :)--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
==Hi==
:Ditto.  Oh, you may want to know that we've just this weekend updated our archiving templates.  So if you want to make them compatible with the archive tool you can find under this page's edit drop down, just replace all your architecture at the top of the page with the simple template {{tl|ArchCat}}.  ON your individual archives, you can replace what you have now with {{tl|ArchPage}}.  If you want :)  Note, however, that these templates will continue to be supported and upgraded in the future, whereas the ones you're currently using may be subject to deletion, as they're not compatible with the current automatic archiving system.  Anyway, thanks and good luck at DWA. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''18:22:59 Sun&nbsp;'''04 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


Sorry [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 12:15, July 25, 2010 (UTC)                                yes
== DW Answers wordmark ==


==The Full Wiki - reply==
I'm unable to leave a message on your user talk page at DW Answers because you have the page sysop locked, for some reason. I know that Answers sites take a lot of fly-by vandalism, but you might want to consider whether it's wise the lead admin to be unreachable by normal talk page communication.  But I digress. To celebrate the clean sweep you're proposing, I've dashed off a new wordmark for you that'll work better with really any background, but especially dark ones. I created [http://drwho.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:New_logo a forum post] about it and alerted your other bureaucrats to it.  If you don't like it, I certainly won't be offended if you don't use it.  But a transparent wordmark of ''some'' kind would probably be more flexible than the current, white-backgrounded design.
Hey, sorry, yes I did get a reply from Wikia central. (I just found it in amongst a bunch of emails, I got it on the 21st July) anyways here's the content of the reply:


<blockquote>''Thanks for contacting Wikia. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Right now, the best thing to do would be to ask them to properly attribute it under the terms of CC-BY-SA. The easiest way for them to do this is to add a link to the original article and a link to the history page (thereby attributing all authors) on the talk page of the article(s) with unattributed content. If that doesn't work, feel free to let us know and we'll see what we can do. Thanks! -- Best regards, Brandon Rhea Wikia Community Support Helper''</blockquote>
And, not that I'm one of your admins or anything, but your suggestion to just nuke the questions you have and start afresh is a '''fantastic''' idea. However, it might be wise to spend the next week or so getting some policies in order.  Seriously, have you checked out BC's jaw-dropping revisions to the blocking policy?  You might want, also, to have some concrete guidelines for how you'd like questions asked and answered.  What format should the pages in your [[namespace]] 0 take?  Give some practical examples of good and bad ways to phrase questions.  Show people whether you want to separate individual answers with horizontal lines, indentation or headings. Then, after you're sure you've explained the basics, drop the nuclear bomb and regenerate the site. In other words, '''absolutely''' get rid of those 5000+ pages, but have a clear set of guidelines for how the site is going to run.


I haven't contacted them as yet. I've just been looking around, on many pages the now state "From TARDIS Index File, the free Doctor Who reference." but that's it as far as attribution that I can find. It's also not just this wiki's content, but also other wikias and Wikipedia's content.
Or at least, that's how ''I'd'' do it. Your milage could indeed vary.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''17:03:37 Tue&nbsp;'''06 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


If you want to contact them to inform them of this, I'm happy for you to. Alternatively if you wish I'll contact them. Though I'm considering posting this on the Wikia Community Forums just so we can see if this is really wikia wide and whether a community wide effort or what should be done. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:28, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
== [[user:BroadcastCorp]] using sock puppets ==


:Just to keep you informed, I just sent a message off to The Full Wiki, I'll keep you updated if I get ''anything'' back from them. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:39, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
You should read [[user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned]].  BC has been confirmed by Wikia to be using sock puppets.  Here, his sock is (at least) [[user:DomeSeven]].  We know he also has used an IP account on at least one occasion.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''21:15:04 Mon&nbsp;'''12 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


== Being unfair ==
{{Please see|Page Creation time}} [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 22:27, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}06:31: Wed&nbsp;21 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>


Please stop trying to delete my page about LUCIE JONES
== Spoilers ==
==River/Rory forum==
Well, this rule has been in place since 7 June 2010.  So I'm pretty sure you've been around since it's been in force.  It's explained pretty exhaustively at [[T:SPOIL]].  But the basic deal is that spoilers are only allowed on the series page and any thread in [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]].  So, [[Series 7 (Doctor Who 2005)]] is the only place for what you put at ''[[Doctor Who]]'' — and I'm fairly sure the series 7 page already had that. 


Can you answer the point in the River/Rory thread? I'm very interested in seeing your point. --[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 13:55, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
Although you should read the whole of [[T:SPOIL]], you should probably pay special attention to [[T:SPOIL DEF]] [[T:OFFICIAL INFO]] and [[T:OFF REL]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:50: Mon&nbsp;30 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>


==The Howling discussions==
== Ban at DWA ==
There is something of a fine line between heated discussion and negative comments. It may be that I'm looking at the threads from the outside and skimming them somewhat, but they seem heated and somewhat rash, but I don't see any really offensive comments or personal attacks, if they're around and made by any user, please show me and I'll intercede.
Heya :)  Hate to be writing you with such unpleasantness at the holidays, but one of your new admin, [[user:Master of Spiders|Master of Spiders]] has rather randomly banned me at DWA, based upon the 2011 madness with [[user:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]].  Any chance you could pop back on DWA and unban me again?  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 16:05: Thu 20 Dec 2012</span>
{{Christmas greetings}}


The Howling is one place that I really don't have a lot of time for, (dislike may be too strong a word), but it's not my favourite part of the wiki. So any issues there you'll need to point them out to me. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 15:34, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
How dare you call me vandalistic. I've done nothing of the sort. The last thing I did on here was Doctor Who-related and shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. Glad to see the deletion of the article was reversed.
 
== Section stub ==
 
Great! I will use this from now on, I will still use a TV stub etc, but it will be easier to User to identify what section(s) is/are stub(s) now one. I may start putting the section stub across the stub page tomorrow. Cheers [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 18:49, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
 
==New policies==
Hey, just thought I'd inform you of a few new policies I've recently added; [[Tardis:Discussion policy]], [[Tardis:No personal attacks]] and [[Tardis:Blocking policy]]. Hopefully this will help to frame user's responses and inform users on the forums and talk pages. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 16:41, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 
<strike>So...are you acknowledging that your River Song Series 6 "theory" is wrong? You can't explain it, right? Then stop spamming the forum by posting the whole thing over and over again across threads asking people to agree with you. --[[Special:Contributions/222.166.181.246|222.166.181.246]] 06:40, August 3, 2010 (UTC)</strike>
 
== <strike>Vandalisms in the Howling</strike> ==
 
<strike>Please note that your previous responses such as "There's an IP who you totally don't want to hear you having said that.... [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:42, August 1, 2010 (UTC) " in the thread [[Forum:Series 6 things|Series 6 things]] are inappropriate to the discussion forums. This forum is '''not''' to be used for general discussion, 'what/who is your favourite' discussions, personal discussions or off-topic discussions that do not directly concern this wiki and its content. You could also refer to the [[Tardis:Discussion policy]] which states that</strike>
 
 
 
<strike>*'''Forums, blogs must be on-topic''' - This means they must discuss something related to the wiki, whether it be an internal continuity issue, new material that is yet to be broadcast or published, or discussing potential changes to the wiki.
</strike>*
 
:<strike>:*'''Article talk pages must be relate to the ''editing'' of the article''' - Discussions on an article's talk page must relate to the editing of the article ''not'' the narrative features of the article. </strike>
 
 
:*
 
<strike>--[[Special:Contributions/222.166.181.213|222.166.181.213]] 10:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)</strike>
 
 
 
:: <strike>It is clearly shown that you were off-topic with no intention of contributing to the thread. You should note that the forum is '''not''' to be used for general discussion.</strike>
 
 
 
:: <strike>You have also recently undo an edit on 203.168.176.42's talk page, where another has been asked to edit, without permission, "'''altering, editing or rewriting another user's comments is considered vandalism.'''"</strike>
 
 
 
:: <strike>You should note that the Howling was never intended to be used for off-topic general dicussion as it has always been clearly stated on [[Forum:The Howling|The Howling]]. You should also note that you have been warned on numerous occasions both in the forum and on your talk page. --[[Special:Contributions/222.166.181.11|222.166.181.11]] 13:56, August 3, 2010 (UTC)</strike>
 
== The Howling. ==
Hey, can you quickly go trough The Howling and put the deletion tag on any pages I may have missed. Cheers. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 14:16, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
::The ones I've not put for deletion, just to check if they are within the Howling rules. I don't have time at this moment to finished what I started yesterday. Thanks [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 15:19, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
 
== <strike>Vandalisms On Other Users' Talk Page</strike> ==
 
<strike>This is the third time you have been warned to stop undoing edits on 203.168.176.42's talk page without permission, "'''altering, editing or rewriting another user's comments is considered vandalism.'''" Your constant vandalisms on users' talk page and non-contributing posts to threads in the Howling will not be tolerated on TARDIS Index File. --[[Special:Contributions/222.166.181.237|222.166.181.237]] 14:44, August 3, 2010 (UTC)</strike>
 
==Changing user's user pages etc Re:Location infobox==
Thought I'd reply here rather than on the forum as the subject's essentially closed (and wasn't sure if you'd still keep an eye on it). It is allowable within the [[Tardis:Vandalism policy]] to make ''minor'' changes to a user's user page to make the wiki run smoother, these minor changes include removing categories that are placed in error on a user's page, changing article names (following a move or to remove redirects) or de-linking articles. You did the right thing alerting the user to the fact on their user page, but as they've not been active for some time it would have been alright to also de-link the link to the infobox and not why in the edit summary. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:06, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
== doctor who the official annual 2011 was book==
it was a book the thrtteen doctor not dvd and not tv show it was book
 
now i going to tell you :
*i am fan of doctor who
*i like doctor who
*i warth doctor who
*i know the dalek
*i warth sarah jane advture
*i warth torchwood
*i warth k9
*i warth k9 and compley ( dvd)
*i read doctor who book
*i read sarah jane advture book
*my name is liam harrison
*i from website callled facebook
tell user about me and dont send a messing to me agian
 
:That would be better if you could spell watch. [[User:mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 20:50, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Okay ==
 
Okay, sorry for removing your delete tag, but I don't see any reason why you put it there.
 
 
 
Very well, can give the chance to change it, instead of you deleting it straight away?
 
== What did I do? ==
 
Exscuse me but I not exactly sure what I did in reply to your message last week about rumours. Please can you tell me so that I can either learn from my mistakes or change my password in-case someone is hacking my account. Thank you. [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 17:25, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Are you sure? ==
 
So there is nothing we can do to save my page from being deleted? Are you sure there is nothing what so ever? Nothing at all?
 
== Missing something ==
 
Thanks for your advice, but whats your unamed space? I've never heard of it.
 
== Thank you ==
 
Thanks for telling me, and yes I would definatly like you to move it there.
 
== Torchwood ==
 
No, Steven Moffat has said that he will follow the same pattern as RTD, but he strongly implied about the number of stories he is writing. Where is the evidence that shows it was about what stories he's writing for where to be placed. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 15:53, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
Well all that says to me is basically he's following the same pattern that russel does when it comes to how many episodes there writing. Therefore this information is speculative and should be removed. If it can't stay for the torch wood page then it won't stay for Series 6. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 16:11, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
==Check edits histories==
Hi, be sure to double check edit histories before warning users, the ''Rise of the Cybermen'' recent edit by an IP editor and Revanvolatrelundar for example. The IP editor added the copied Wikipedia plot, Revanvolatrelundar was merely the next editor who edited it. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:53, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 
hi pleace leve feedback
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[[User:Coxrb001|Coxrb001]] 06:03, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
 
== RE: Disambiguation ==
 
Hi There - I kind of realised I needed to instigated a move but I wasn't sure exactly how to do it or who to ask... Thats why I did it in a funny way... Could you possibly tell me? =] --[[User:The Brig|The Brig]] 20:46, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
 
Thanks! Will help in the future! --[[User:The Brig|The Brig]] 20:49, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
 
==Fish custard reply==
I am a doctor who fan. I am not vandalising, if I am I'm sorry. I am spreading my opinion about things, suggesting things, and if I want to protect my favorite episodes I can. If you delete everyones edit, then why do you have and "Edit this page" button in the first place

Latest revision as of 19:59, 25 April 2024

Archive.png
Archives: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5

Trenzalore[[edit source]]

Trenzalore was a place that, according to Dorium Maldovar, would be where the First Question in the Universe would be answered truthfully. The Doctor would arrive there at some point in his travels, at the fall of the Eleventh. The religious order known as the Silence was determined to ensure that the Doctor never reached Trenzalore. (DW: The Wedding of River Song) [1] History

Let's regress for a moment back to the Men in Black(MIB). According to John Keel, the MIB often state that they are representatives of the "Nation of the Third Eye."

  Based on some of the info already researched, it is

apparent that Sirius has been in contact with humanity for a long time. According to George Hunt Williamson (one of the early contactees) in his book "Other Tongues, Other Flesh,"[2] the earth allies of Sirius, i.e., the secret societies, use the Eye of Horus as an insignia. This symbol has also been seen on the MIB. Secret societies believe that there is a Great White Lodge on earth. They call it Shamballa -- and consider it to be the spiritual center of the world. Now, theosophists such as Alice Bailey say that the Great White Lodge is on Sirius. If the All-Seeing-Eye is a symbol of Sirius' earth-allies and the MIB wear that symbol, and if Shamballa represents the Great White Lodge on earth -- then the MIB are emissaries of Shamballa. Sirius and Shamballa are two sides of the same coin. This is verified in the book "The Undiscovered Country,"[3] by Stephen Jenkins. Jenkins was told by Buddhist priests that Shamballa was located in the constellation of Orion.

  The entrance to Shamballa on earth is usually placed in the

trans-Himalayan region. Some assert it is in the heart of the Gobi Desert (where there have been allegations of crashed disks and bases). According to the explorer Nicholas Roerich, there are caves in the Himalayas foothills that have subterranean passages. In one of the these passages, there is a stone door that has never been opened, because the time for its opening has not yet arrived. In 1930, Doreal founded the Brotherhood of the White Temple. He says that the entrance to Shamballa is far underground. he goes on to say that space bends around Shamballa, and that there is a warp which leads into another universe.

--

Thanks[[edit source]]

Thanks for that and good luck with the answers site. :)--Skittles the hog - talk 17:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Ditto. Oh, you may want to know that we've just this weekend updated our archiving templates. So if you want to make them compatible with the archive tool you can find under this page's edit drop down, just replace all your architecture at the top of the page with the simple template {{ArchCat}}. ON your individual archives, you can replace what you have now with {{ArchPage}}. If you want :) Note, however, that these templates will continue to be supported and upgraded in the future, whereas the ones you're currently using may be subject to deletion, as they're not compatible with the current automatic archiving system. Anyway, thanks and good luck at DWA.
czechout<staff />   18:22:59 Sun 04 Sep 2011 

DW Answers wordmark[[edit source]]

I'm unable to leave a message on your user talk page at DW Answers because you have the page sysop locked, for some reason. I know that Answers sites take a lot of fly-by vandalism, but you might want to consider whether it's wise the lead admin to be unreachable by normal talk page communication. But I digress. To celebrate the clean sweep you're proposing, I've dashed off a new wordmark for you that'll work better with really any background, but especially dark ones. I created a forum post about it and alerted your other bureaucrats to it. If you don't like it, I certainly won't be offended if you don't use it. But a transparent wordmark of some kind would probably be more flexible than the current, white-backgrounded design.

And, not that I'm one of your admins or anything, but your suggestion to just nuke the questions you have and start afresh is a fantastic idea. However, it might be wise to spend the next week or so getting some policies in order. Seriously, have you checked out BC's jaw-dropping revisions to the blocking policy? You might want, also, to have some concrete guidelines for how you'd like questions asked and answered. What format should the pages in your namespace 0 take? Give some practical examples of good and bad ways to phrase questions. Show people whether you want to separate individual answers with horizontal lines, indentation or headings. Then, after you're sure you've explained the basics, drop the nuclear bomb and regenerate the site. In other words, absolutely get rid of those 5000+ pages, but have a clear set of guidelines for how the site is going to run.

Or at least, that's how I'd do it. Your milage could indeed vary.
czechout<staff />   17:03:37 Tue 06 Sep 2011 

user:BroadcastCorp using sock puppets[[edit source]]

You should read user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned. BC has been confirmed by Wikia to be using sock puppets. Here, his sock is (at least) user:DomeSeven. We know he also has used an IP account on at least one occasion.
czechout<staff />   21:15:04 Mon 12 Sep 2011 

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Page Creation time. MM/Want to talk? 22:27, October 1, 2011 (UTC)

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff />   06:31: Wed 21 Dec 2011 

Spoilers[[edit source]]

Well, this rule has been in place since 7 June 2010. So I'm pretty sure you've been around since it's been in force. It's explained pretty exhaustively at T:SPOIL. But the basic deal is that spoilers are only allowed on the series page and any thread in The Howling. So, Series 7 (Doctor Who 2005) is the only place for what you put at Doctor Who — and I'm fairly sure the series 7 page already had that.

Although you should read the whole of T:SPOIL, you should probably pay special attention to T:SPOIL DEF T:OFFICIAL INFO and T:OFF REL.
czechout<staff />   15:50: Mon 30 Apr 2012 

Ban at DWA[[edit source]]

Heya :) Hate to be writing you with such unpleasantness at the holidays, but one of your new admin, Master of Spiders has rather randomly banned me at DWA, based upon the 2011 madness with BroadcastCorp. Any chance you could pop back on DWA and unban me again? Thanks :)
czechout<staff />    16:05: Thu 20 Dec 2012

Christmas cheer[[edit source]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png


How dare you call me vandalistic. I've done nothing of the sort. The last thing I did on here was Doctor Who-related and shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. Glad to see the deletion of the article was reversed.