User talk:The Thirteenth Doctor: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--{| width="100%" style="background: #800080; "
<!--{| width="100%" style="background: #800080; "
| valign="top" width="50%" style="background:purple; border: 2px solid #800080; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|<h2></h2>-->
| valign="top" width="50%" style="background:purple; border: 2px solid #800080; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|<h2></h2>-->
{{user talk archives|1|2|3|4}}
{{ArchCat}}


==Categories==
==Trenzalore==
Have you checked around to make sure there's nothing else that can go in the archaeology category? But if there's nothing to go into the category, yes definitely change it so archaeology (the article) is placed within the two categories. I'll also merge the two pages shortly. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 11:49, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Trenzalore was a place that, according to Dorium Maldovar, would be where the First Question in the Universe would be answered truthfully. The Doctor would arrive there at some point in his travels, at the fall of the Eleventh. The religious order known as the Silence was determined to ensure that the Doctor never reached Trenzalore. (DW: The Wedding of River Song) [1] History


:Yep, any categories that have less than 3 articles within them I think don't really need to be categories, the articles can be categoried elsewhere, just be sure to check the 'what links here' before exorcising them of their content (sometimes that what links here might give some indication of other things that might be categorised into it). Also thanks for the SJA bracket correction. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:58, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
Let's regress for a moment back to the Men in Black(MIB). According to John Keel, the MIB often state that they are representatives of the "Nation of the Third Eye."
::For the record, there almost certainly '''are''' other things which can go into [[:Category:Archaeology]], given that major characters in the Whoniverse are archaeologists.  There '''must''' be something in a Benny book or audio about an archaeological dig. I don't know the character that well, but I'd find it pretty hard to believe she hasn't been portrayed as actively practicing archaeology sometime in her 10 series of audios and thousands of pages of prose.  [[The Library]] arguably deserves to be classed under archaeology, since the team was led by River Song, an archaeologist.  The [[Nine Travellers]] should be put under archaeology, as well, since the site was quite obviously being studied by [[Amelia Rumford]], an archaeologist. Pretty sure there must be something archaeological about the  [[pyramid]]s of [[Egypt]], since Scarman is quite obviously on an archaeological dig at the top of ''[[Pyramids of Mars]]''.
::Though the "Rule of Three" TD mentions above is certainly useful, I think you also have to be judicious about it.  Having spent a lot of time organizing categories and nominating some for deletion, the thing I've found most useful is caution. Don't ''arbitrarily'' delete a category before carefully considering whether it is ''likely'' that there is more information on that subject that ''has yet to be written'' on this site.  A corollary to that rule is that if it can contain even a single ''sub''category (itself containing at least three pages), then the category should be kept.  I think we could quite easily have a subcategory [[:category:Archaeological sites]] under [[:Category:Archaeology]].  Just on the basis of televised DW alone, there's at least:
::*the site Scarman was at in ep 1 of Pyramids
::*the Tomb of the Cybermen from the serial of the same name
::*the Library
::*the Nine Travellers
::*Stonehenge (mostly by way of its inclusion in dialogue in ''The Stones of Blood'', not really for ''The Pandorica Opens'')
::*the site in ''Battlefield''
::That alone justifies the Archaeology category.  '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 13:16, November 27, 2010 (UTC)


==Thanks==
  Based on some of the info already researched, it is
Thanks for the advice. I have made a fourum page so please edit that and show people waht you think. Also am I as you said a episode editing pro or con? [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 14:26, October 21, 2010 (UTC)


== Vortex Manipulator ==
apparent that Sirius has been in contact with humanity for a long time. According to George Hunt Williamson (one of the early contactees) in his book "Other Tongues, Other Flesh,"[2] the earth allies of Sirius, i.e., the secret societies, use the Eye of Horus as an insignia. This symbol has also been seen on the MIB. Secret societies believe that there is a Great White Lodge on earth. They call it Shamballa -- and consider it to be the spiritual center of the world. Now, theosophists such as Alice Bailey say that the Great White Lodge is on Sirius. If the All-Seeing-Eye is a symbol of Sirius' earth-allies and the MIB wear that symbol, and if Shamballa represents the Great White Lodge on earth -- then the MIB are emissaries of Shamballa. Sirius and Shamballa are two sides of the same coin. This is verified in the book "The Undiscovered Country,"[3] by Stephen Jenkins. Jenkins was told by Buddhist priests that Shamballa was located in the constellation of Orion.


Want me to try and separate them then? - ''<span style ="color:midnightblue">I. Am. [[User: Excalibur-117|Excalibur-117]]</span>''<span style ="color:midnightblue">-<sup>([[User talk:Excalibur-117|talk]] • [[Special: Contributions/ Excalibur-117|contribs]])</sup></span> 16:08, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
  The entrance to Shamballa on earth is usually placed in the


== images doctor ==
trans-Himalayan region. Some assert it is in the heart of the Gobi Desert (where there have been allegations of crashed disks and bases). According to the explorer Nicholas Roerich, there are caves in the Himalayas foothills that have subterranean passages. In one of the these passages, there is a stone door that has never been opened, because the time for its opening has not yet arrived. In 1930, Doreal founded the Brotherhood of the White Temple. He says that the entrance to Shamballa is far underground. he goes on to say that space bends around Shamballa, and that there is a warp which leads into another universe.


can we make an exception with these article, its really hard to get good images. ([[User:Ceryu|Ceryu]] 22:09, October 24, 2010 (UTC))
--


==Infobox==
== Thanks ==
Thanks for letting me know, I've reverted to a previous edit for now until I can make sure it works correctly. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 12:34, October 25, 2010 (UTC)


==New pages==
Thanks for that and good luck with the answers site. :)--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 17:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
It's sort of assumed that when creating a page you've got something to write about, I'm reticent to create a policy just about that, but I've added a note to the [[Tardis:Community Portal]] saying to make sure you've got enough to justify an article. It's sometimes hard to define exactly how much is "enough" given the wide range of articles, but as I re-check through policies/help articles I'll see if I can add it elsewhere. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 13:58, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
:Ditto.  Oh, you may want to know that we've just this weekend updated our archiving templates.  So if you want to make them compatible with the archive tool you can find under this page's edit drop down, just replace all your architecture at the top of the page with the simple template {{tl|ArchCat}}.  ON your individual archives, you can replace what you have now with {{tl|ArchPage}}.  If you want :)  Note, however, that these templates will continue to be supported and upgraded in the future, whereas the ones you're currently using may be subject to deletion, as they're not compatible with the current automatic archiving system. Anyway, thanks and good luck at DWA. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''18:22:59 Sun&nbsp;'''04 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


== Santiago's dad ==
== DW Answers wordmark ==


It's not a big deal, but obviously that was the point of RTD's coy line. It's being wilfully difficult to say "Ah, yes, but we did not have an extra ten words specifying ''why'' he was a member." If we're being literal and not allowed to understand the writerly decisions behind lines, then we have to believe outright that the Doctor can regenerate 507 times also (when this is a joke). Clearly it's meant to be saying "Look, Santiago's a normal boy whose dad is gay but is still an active father in many respects." I thought (admittedly, from a real-world perspective), that this was an interesting portrayal. It's probably also an interesting thing about Santiago in terms of his real-world biography, anyway.[[User:Zythe|Zythe]] 15:17, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
I'm unable to leave a message on your user talk page at DW Answers because you have the page sysop locked, for some reason. I know that Answers sites take a lot of fly-by vandalism, but you might want to consider whether it's wise the lead admin to be unreachable by normal talk page communication. But I digress. To celebrate the clean sweep you're proposing, I've dashed off a new wordmark for you that'll work better with really any background, but especially dark ones. I created [http://drwho.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:New_logo a forum post] about it and alerted your other bureaucrats to it.  If you don't like it, I certainly won't be offended if you don't use it.  But a transparent wordmark of ''some'' kind would probably be more flexible than the current, white-backgrounded design.
:Does the Doctor's flippant delivery to the question not actually imply, textually, that it is intended to be humorous? I can't see why a person can't exercise a little critical judgement.[[User:Zythe|Zythe]] 23:00, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
::Apart from the comic delivery, we both know that Russell T Davies explained that it was definitely meant as a joke.[[User:Zythe|Zythe]] 15:15, November 1, 2010 (UTC)


== Jo Jones ==
And, not that I'm one of your admins or anything, but your suggestion to just nuke the questions you have and start afresh is a '''fantastic''' idea.  However, it might be wise to spend the next week or so getting some policies in order.  Seriously, have you checked out BC's jaw-dropping revisions to the blocking policy?  You might want, also, to have some concrete guidelines for how you'd like questions asked and answered.  What format should the pages in your [[namespace]] 0 take?  Give some practical examples of good and bad ways to phrase questions.  Show people whether you want to separate individual answers with horizontal lines, indentation or headings.  Then, after you're sure you've explained the basics, drop the nuclear bomb and regenerate the site. In other words, '''absolutely''' get rid of those 5000+ pages, but have a clear set of guidelines for how the site is going to run.


Jo did NOT die in a house fire in 2028! That's just nonsense in those Virgin novels that those idiots write, how could you allow such a horrible thing to be written about someone as nice as Jo without even saying it might to be true? She didn't die, she died peacefully in her sleep god damn it. No offence.
Or at least, that's how ''I'd'' do it. Your milage could indeed vary. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''17:03:37 Tue&nbsp;'''06 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


Theres no need to take offence, I didn't swear at you or anything like that, and I'm sorry if you feel that way and I'm pretty sure you did remove my edit, as I saw it. The people who wrote the books were not idiots, but I find them bad writers because they like interfering, apart from killing off half the people who have ever been in the show, the continous sexual agenda and the numerous stuff to contradict the Time War, they haven't really contributed anything to the Whoniverse.
== [[user:BroadcastCorp]] using sock puppets ==


It seems to me though that you enjoy suffering and people dying, and I wouldn't call that speculation...and I've seen many of your edits on Doctor Who Wiki, do you even have a life outside of this? Because all you seem to be doing is coming on here and making articles as dull as possible. I can name many times when I've felt offended by you for dehumanizing yourself and others. I could go on.
You should read [[user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned]].  BC has been confirmed by Wikia to be using sock puppets. Here, his sock is (at least) [[user:DomeSeven]].  We know he also has used an IP account on at least one occasion. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''21:15:04 Mon&nbsp;'''12 Sep 2011&nbsp;</span>


And before you take offence yet again, that paragraph above wasn't offensive either, and to be honest in a world where people can execute woman for commiting adultery or removing their burkhas, I think I can say you're making this site dull. Its like you enjoy the grim idea of Jo dying, if the whole world just ended, and everyone you ever knew was dead...would you still treat it as a "stone cold fact" and not think anything else of it? Because with your language and attitude you're giving me that impression.
{{Please see|Page Creation time}} [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 22:27, October 1, 2011 (UTC)
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}06:31: Wed&nbsp;21 Dec 2011&nbsp;</span>


~ThePandoricaOpens666 17:31 27th October 2010
== Spoilers ==
Well, this rule has been in place since 7 June 2010.  So I'm pretty sure you've been around since it's been in force.  It's explained pretty exhaustively at [[T:SPOIL]].  But the basic deal is that spoilers are only allowed on the series page and any thread in [[Howling:The Howling|The Howling]].  So, [[Series 7 (Doctor Who 2005)]] is the only place for what you put at ''[[Doctor Who]]'' — and I'm fairly sure the series 7 page already had that. 


Although you should read the whole of [[T:SPOIL]], you should probably pay special attention to [[T:SPOIL DEF]] [[T:OFFICIAL INFO]] and [[T:OFF REL]]. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}15:50: Mon&nbsp;30 Apr 2012&nbsp;</span>


== Ban at DWA ==
Heya :)  Hate to be writing you with such unpleasantness at the holidays, but one of your new admin, [[user:Master of Spiders|Master of Spiders]] has rather randomly banned me at DWA, based upon the 2011 madness with [[user:BroadcastCorp|BroadcastCorp]].  Any chance you could pop back on DWA and unban me again?  Thanks :) {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 16:05: Thu 20 Dec 2012</span>
{{Christmas greetings}}


 
How dare you call me vandalistic. I've done nothing of the sort. The last thing I did on here was Doctor Who-related and shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. Glad to see the deletion of the article was reversed.
 
 
 
Hmmmm....I guess.
 
~ThePandoricaOpens666 19:36 27th October 2010 (UTC)
 
I'm sorry I was a bit rude to you, I have a problem at the moment with people in authority and get frustrated very easily.
 
~ThePandoricaOpens666 22:14 27th October, 2010 (UTC)
 
hey no 13 i just edited your user, so what r u gonna do about it?
 
how do you have the power to block someone?
==Apologies==
Im very sorry about earlier, I don't know what came over me! Just ask Skittles the hog for instance!
 
But all the same the idea of people editing on this wonderful Doctor Who fact machine, with programes like DR wHO it really makes this site amazing!
 
And I'm so so sorry, but I think I've said enough, I'm hoping you reply with a good positive, comment after this sadly distruptive time with me and you.
 
I just hope you'll forgive me, so much, really please just forgive I will not do it again!
 
sorry!
 
hello? im sorry by the way!
 
== 2x30 ==
 
Most Doctor Who stories are shown in the x x-minute format. For example: [[The Talons of Weng-Chiang]] and [[Delta and the Bannermen]]. Surely this would be the format to use to keep up the pattern?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 19:52, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 
:Either way there are alot of changes to be made. I think 2x30 minutes format is best though so I will make a start. Thanks--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 21:11, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 
:On second thoughs, I do not think it looks very nice in that format and I think the hyphon prevents people getting mixed up. Perhaps submit this to the forums?--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 21:20, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 
:Well it clearly links the number and the word minute.--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]] 14:05, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Trivia ==
 
when was the cheetah people and catkind shown to have retractable claws? [[User:Kingdomcode|Kingdomcode]] 21:57, October 30, 2010 (UTC)Kingdomcode
 
== re: Retractable claws ==
 
when was their claws shown in new earth? who's claws was shown? who was he/she going to scratch? and was he/she going to kill that person? [[User:Kingdomcode|Kingdomcode]] 00:09, October 31, 2010 (UTC)Kingdomcode
 
==Followed pages==
Just a favour, could you stop following 'Cat:Tangerineduel the rap...'. As despite the category being deleted it is the first thing that appears beside your talk page. Alternatively (or as well as) you can make your followed list private (go to "Preferences," and then "Followed pages" and check "Make my followed pages list private") Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 11:10, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Youre not a admin ==
 
Dear 13th doctor
 
Why do boss people about even though your not a admin thats for admins so most of the users like me and other people
 
so i just stop bovering people
 
thanks
 
ps how do you loke at the history its taking me a long time to fiqure it out and if it dosent have history im going to ask wikia to change it back
==Read this!!!==
 
YOU NO WHAT, YOU SEEN THE LOST IN TIME TRAILER, WELL YOU SEE RANI, CLYDE AND SARAH JANE!!!
 
 
[[User:PremierChannel 1999|PremierChannel 1999]] 13:36, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Video Game ==
 
Just thinking a video game (& Adventure Games) template a'la Series 5 template [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 19:42, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Video Game ==
 
Just thinking a video game (& Adventure Games) template a'la Series 5 template [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 19:42, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 
== Help ==
 
Hi The Thirteenth Doctor. I have just become an admin on The Sarah Jane Adventures Wiki. I think [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] is a regular user on it as well '''but''' it is in ''really'' bad shape. There are loads of VITAL pages that need creating and that's where you come in. You are one of the top editors on this wiki and look at it now; It's number 10 on the "Wiki Charts". Please would you try to help Sarah Jane Adventures Wiki by creating some of these pages and I could help by asking the guy in charge (Mini-mitch I think) to make you and admin. This is not bribary. Please could you help or at least have a look. I have left a similar message with Tangerineduel Thanks so much. [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 16:17, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 
Hi, did you see the above message? Please reply. [[User:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] 17:48, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
 
== k9 ==
 
we need a solution k9 MK.3 has go the delete tag again and there is pretty good arguments to delete it. we need a solution or we could have a editing war for 2 YEARS. [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 19:15, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
 
{{Please see|Moving the tables of content to the right}} '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 21:15, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Tags ==
 
What happened to the tags on the series 6 page? [[User:Joshoedit|Joshoedit]] 00:13, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Discussion in Forums ==
 
Could I ask you to leave your thoughts on the discussion on speculation in forum [[Forum:Speculation - What is and was isn't?|here?]]. Thanks. [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]] 21:25, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
{{please see|Is using "First Doctor", "Second Doctor" etc in-universe?}} {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}
 
{{Please see|Renaming New Earth}} {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}
 
==Human --> human==
Did you want to add any more to the debate at  [[Forum:"Human" shouldn't be capitalised]]? {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;'''17:09:13 Sun&nbsp;'''27 Feb 2011&nbsp;
{{please see|Is The Curse of Fatal Death canon?}} {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''20:02:42 Fri&nbsp;'''11 Mar 2011&nbsp;</span>
 
{{Please see|Character information on novels, etc}} [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 17:25, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 
{{Please see|Should novels & audio stories have a plot description?}} --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:38, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
==Spoilers in [[forum:The Howling|The Howling]]==
I see that you recently chastised [[user:Ghastly9090|Ghastly9090]] for including spoilers in The Howling.  However, you seem to hold a mistaken view of that forum.  The Howling is ''not'' a spoiler-free zone, as the text at [[forum:The Howling]] makes ''very'' clear.  I'm sorry that your experience of series 6 might've been spoiled, but it's hardly Ghastly9090's fault that he used The Howling ''appropriately''. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''17:34:20 Sat&nbsp;'''16 Apr 2011&nbsp;</span>
:You've answered your own question when you noted that "nowhere [in the spoiler policy] does it say spoilers can be discussed on the Howling or on any forum". Precisely.  What policy doesn't restrict, it implicitly allows.  And, again, there's a big ol' warning at [[Forum:The Howling]] that says, "there be spoilers here". 
 
:It comes down to a practical issue of policing.  In order to determine whether something is or isn't a spoiler, an admin would have to look at it.  If the admin doesn't want to be spoiled, then he or she is forced into the uncomfortable position of having to spoil his enjoyment of the program in order to uphold his duties as an admin of enforcing policy. Thus, it's simply best to ''allow'' spoilers in The Howling and to put up a warning that there ''are'' spoilers present there. 
 
:In effect, there's no way to operationalize a spoiler ban in the Howling, so '''there is no ban'''.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''19:07:21 Sat&nbsp;'''16 Apr 2011&nbsp;</span>
::You're selectively quoting from the paragraph, in my view.  The thing reads in full:
:::Spoiler information relating to not-yet-released stories must be kept to series or, in some cases, story articles. Please do not create articles about narrative elements rumoured to exist within stories that haven't been released. It is impossible to verify such things before the story is released.
::As the second and third sentences go on to say, it's talking about keeping spoiler information on story/series pages versus putting them on in-universe (i.e. narrative element) articles.  It doesn't '''at all''' talk about your user page, a file description page, a template, or the forum.  If it had meant to ban that, it would have talked about those namespaces.  Instead, the paragraph as a whole is talking about the main namespace.   
 
::But I think you're missing the point.  It's ''impossible'' to police this without requiring that admin spoil their own enjoyment of the show.  Even if every admin were willing to submit to a "tough, you must be spoiled to be an admin here" kinda policy, the sheer ''workload'' of keeping up with the Howling would be ridiculous.  Particularly when the show is actively in season.  The whole point of The Howling, from my perspective, is that it's essentially a place where users can do what they want (so long as they don't violate copyright or deliberately defame people).  Again, '''there is a warning''' up on the Howling's page saying that spoilers are allowed.  I really can't understand why you're ignoring that, or trying to find some loophole in the spoiler policy.  It's just not a thing admin are obligated, by policy, to actively worry about.
 
::If you'd like clearer language on the spoiler policy, fine, I"m willing to change it to ''specifically'' say "Spoilers are allowed in the Howling."  But that wouldn't represent a change to policy.  It would just add emphasis. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''20:39:23 Sat&nbsp;'''16 Apr 2011&nbsp;</span>

Latest revision as of 19:59, 25 April 2024

Archive.png
Archives: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5

Trenzalore[[edit source]]

Trenzalore was a place that, according to Dorium Maldovar, would be where the First Question in the Universe would be answered truthfully. The Doctor would arrive there at some point in his travels, at the fall of the Eleventh. The religious order known as the Silence was determined to ensure that the Doctor never reached Trenzalore. (DW: The Wedding of River Song) [1] History

Let's regress for a moment back to the Men in Black(MIB). According to John Keel, the MIB often state that they are representatives of the "Nation of the Third Eye."

  Based on some of the info already researched, it is

apparent that Sirius has been in contact with humanity for a long time. According to George Hunt Williamson (one of the early contactees) in his book "Other Tongues, Other Flesh,"[2] the earth allies of Sirius, i.e., the secret societies, use the Eye of Horus as an insignia. This symbol has also been seen on the MIB. Secret societies believe that there is a Great White Lodge on earth. They call it Shamballa -- and consider it to be the spiritual center of the world. Now, theosophists such as Alice Bailey say that the Great White Lodge is on Sirius. If the All-Seeing-Eye is a symbol of Sirius' earth-allies and the MIB wear that symbol, and if Shamballa represents the Great White Lodge on earth -- then the MIB are emissaries of Shamballa. Sirius and Shamballa are two sides of the same coin. This is verified in the book "The Undiscovered Country,"[3] by Stephen Jenkins. Jenkins was told by Buddhist priests that Shamballa was located in the constellation of Orion.

  The entrance to Shamballa on earth is usually placed in the

trans-Himalayan region. Some assert it is in the heart of the Gobi Desert (where there have been allegations of crashed disks and bases). According to the explorer Nicholas Roerich, there are caves in the Himalayas foothills that have subterranean passages. In one of the these passages, there is a stone door that has never been opened, because the time for its opening has not yet arrived. In 1930, Doreal founded the Brotherhood of the White Temple. He says that the entrance to Shamballa is far underground. he goes on to say that space bends around Shamballa, and that there is a warp which leads into another universe.

--

Thanks[[edit source]]

Thanks for that and good luck with the answers site. :)--Skittles the hog - talk 17:50, September 4, 2011 (UTC)

Ditto. Oh, you may want to know that we've just this weekend updated our archiving templates. So if you want to make them compatible with the archive tool you can find under this page's edit drop down, just replace all your architecture at the top of the page with the simple template {{ArchCat}}. ON your individual archives, you can replace what you have now with {{ArchPage}}. If you want :) Note, however, that these templates will continue to be supported and upgraded in the future, whereas the ones you're currently using may be subject to deletion, as they're not compatible with the current automatic archiving system. Anyway, thanks and good luck at DWA.
czechout<staff />   18:22:59 Sun 04 Sep 2011 

DW Answers wordmark[[edit source]]

I'm unable to leave a message on your user talk page at DW Answers because you have the page sysop locked, for some reason. I know that Answers sites take a lot of fly-by vandalism, but you might want to consider whether it's wise the lead admin to be unreachable by normal talk page communication. But I digress. To celebrate the clean sweep you're proposing, I've dashed off a new wordmark for you that'll work better with really any background, but especially dark ones. I created a forum post about it and alerted your other bureaucrats to it. If you don't like it, I certainly won't be offended if you don't use it. But a transparent wordmark of some kind would probably be more flexible than the current, white-backgrounded design.

And, not that I'm one of your admins or anything, but your suggestion to just nuke the questions you have and start afresh is a fantastic idea. However, it might be wise to spend the next week or so getting some policies in order. Seriously, have you checked out BC's jaw-dropping revisions to the blocking policy? You might want, also, to have some concrete guidelines for how you'd like questions asked and answered. What format should the pages in your namespace 0 take? Give some practical examples of good and bad ways to phrase questions. Show people whether you want to separate individual answers with horizontal lines, indentation or headings. Then, after you're sure you've explained the basics, drop the nuclear bomb and regenerate the site. In other words, absolutely get rid of those 5000+ pages, but have a clear set of guidelines for how the site is going to run.

Or at least, that's how I'd do it. Your milage could indeed vary.
czechout<staff />   17:03:37 Tue 06 Sep 2011 

user:BroadcastCorp using sock puppets[[edit source]]

You should read user talk:BroadcastCorp#You are infinitely banned. BC has been confirmed by Wikia to be using sock puppets. Here, his sock is (at least) user:DomeSeven. We know he also has used an IP account on at least one occasion.
czechout<staff />   21:15:04 Mon 12 Sep 2011 

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Page Creation time. MM/Want to talk? 22:27, October 1, 2011 (UTC)

Your input is needed!

You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.

czechout<staff />   06:31: Wed 21 Dec 2011 

Spoilers[[edit source]]

Well, this rule has been in place since 7 June 2010. So I'm pretty sure you've been around since it's been in force. It's explained pretty exhaustively at T:SPOIL. But the basic deal is that spoilers are only allowed on the series page and any thread in The Howling. So, Series 7 (Doctor Who 2005) is the only place for what you put at Doctor Who — and I'm fairly sure the series 7 page already had that.

Although you should read the whole of T:SPOIL, you should probably pay special attention to T:SPOIL DEF T:OFFICIAL INFO and T:OFF REL.
czechout<staff />   15:50: Mon 30 Apr 2012 

Ban at DWA[[edit source]]

Heya :) Hate to be writing you with such unpleasantness at the holidays, but one of your new admin, Master of Spiders has rather randomly banned me at DWA, based upon the 2011 madness with BroadcastCorp. Any chance you could pop back on DWA and unban me again? Thanks :)
czechout<staff />    16:05: Thu 20 Dec 2012

Christmas cheer[[edit source]]

Happy holidays!

As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.

This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!

We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.

2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!

TardisDataCoreRoadway.png


How dare you call me vandalistic. I've done nothing of the sort. The last thing I did on here was Doctor Who-related and shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. Glad to see the deletion of the article was reversed.