Talk:The Minister of Chance (series): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "== Deletion == This ''does'' deserve a page in my opinion, as the Minister of Chance originated in the DWU and was later adapted elsewhere. However, there was already a di...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Deletion == | == Deletion == | ||
This ''does'' deserve a page in my opinion, as the [[Minister of Chance]] originated in the DWU and was later adapted elsewhere. However, there was already a discussion about this and it is currently held as being in breach of copyright so another discussion would be needed to overrule this. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC) | This ''does'' deserve a page in my opinion, as the [[Minister of Chance]] originated in the DWU and was later adapted elsewhere. However, there was already a discussion about this and it is currently held as being in breach of copyright so another discussion would be needed to overrule this. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
: I do agree. It is unfortunate about the misconception that it is in breach of copyrights, but like you said, this page needs to go for now. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>'''Epsilon'''</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 12:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:28, 27 May 2021
Deletion
This does deserve a page in my opinion, as the Minister of Chance originated in the DWU and was later adapted elsewhere. However, there was already a discussion about this and it is currently held as being in breach of copyright so another discussion would be needed to overrule this. RadMatter ☎ 12:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- I do agree. It is unfortunate about the misconception that it is in breach of copyrights, but like you said, this page needs to go for now. 12:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
