Talk:Tom Baker (in-universe): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


: I agree, and the part in ''Bafflement and Devotion'' is very meta-fictional and not entirely literal. Even if this page does not convey that nuance well. It's hard to talk abour heavy meta-fiction from an in-universe perspective. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 01:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
: I agree, and the part in ''Bafflement and Devotion'' is very meta-fictional and not entirely literal. Even if this page does not convey that nuance well. It's hard to talk abour heavy meta-fiction from an in-universe perspective. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 01:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
:: I also agree. It's much easier to cover the different accounts when they're two separate pages. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|Aquanafrahudy]] [[User talk:Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:11, 29 April 2024

Merge

I disagree with the proposed merge - although some accounts may suggest him to be the same person as the Fourth Doctor, I very much doubt that was the intent of all references to him. Cookieboy 2005 23:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

I agree, and the part in Bafflement and Devotion is very meta-fictional and not entirely literal. Even if this page does not convey that nuance well. It's hard to talk abour heavy meta-fiction from an in-universe perspective. 01:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I also agree. It's much easier to cover the different accounts when they're two separate pages. Aquanafrahudy 10:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)