817
edits
Talk:Eleventh Doctor: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Main image
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
:::The reason I said not to 11 is because due to the fact that it looks like a publicity photo, it may result n edit wars. Also he looks strait into the camera, which is a big no-no for main images. Past the relatively unimportant catchphrase, the Bowie is very unimportant. I would argue that, if six is disliked, then four is the best choice afterwards. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:19, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | :::The reason I said not to 11 is because due to the fact that it looks like a publicity photo, it may result n edit wars. Also he looks strait into the camera, which is a big no-no for main images. Past the relatively unimportant catchphrase, the Bowie is very unimportant. I would argue that, if six is disliked, then four is the best choice afterwards. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 01:19, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::: #11 is clearly the best image of the lot. It's brightly lit, perfectly framed, NOT out-of-universe (seriously?) and just the best one. @OttselSpy25 - I have to say that having followed your edits and specifically your picture uploads on this wiki for a while (not everything on the wiki needs to be redone--focus on things that are actually in need of pictures because there are actually *none*, rather than replacing everything with often dodgy images that aren't really well-thought-out or interesting), I have noticed that your sense of what a well-framed, non-awkward (attractive), iconic or noteworthy image is is something I practically never agree with you on. This is one such example. Your preferred image has the hair cut off (Matt looks better with more of his hair in view) and it's simply not epic enough. And he's not even looking towards the camera, he's looking slightly to the left. He's not doing a bugged-out Tom Baker publicity shot with the eyes straight ahead or the Terrifying Pertwee face/Dracula cape (now those are obvious publicity shots). And NOBODY is going to confuse this image for anything but a screencap. It's a hero shot, which are actually really good images for this sort of thing. Screencaps sometimes do have the actor looking straight ahead (which this actually isn't). The fact that #11 also lights up his eyes is another plus. [[User:NileQT87|NileQT87]] <sup>[[User talk:NileQT87|talk to me]]</sup> 13:05, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | :::: #11 is clearly the best image of the lot. It's brightly lit, perfectly framed, NOT out-of-universe (seriously?) and just the best one. @OttselSpy25 - I have to say that having followed your edits and specifically your picture uploads on this wiki for a while (not everything on the wiki needs to be redone--focus on things that are actually in need of pictures because there are actually *none*, rather than replacing everything with often dodgy images that aren't really well-thought-out or interesting), I have noticed that your sense of what a well-framed, non-awkward (attractive), iconic or noteworthy image is is something I practically never agree with you on. This is one such example. Your preferred image has the hair cut off (Matt looks better with more of his hair in view) and it's simply not epic enough. And he's not even looking towards the camera, he's looking slightly to the left. He's not doing a bugged-out Tom Baker publicity shot with the eyes straight ahead or the Terrifying Pertwee face/Dracula cape (now those are obvious publicity shots). And NOBODY is going to confuse this image for anything but a screencap. It's close to being a hero shot, which are actually really good images for this sort of thing. Most of these images have Matt's face scrunched up or in motion expressions (avoid them!). Screencaps sometimes do have the actor looking straight ahead (which this actually isn't). The fact that #11 also lights up his eyes is another plus. [[User:NileQT87|NileQT87]] <sup>[[User talk:NileQT87|talk to me]]</sup> 13:05, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | ||
