33,205
edits
Talk:Eleventh Doctor: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Main image
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 212: | Line 212: | ||
:::: #11 is clearly the best image of the lot. It's brightly lit, perfectly framed, NOT out-of-universe (seriously?) and just the best one. @OttselSpy25 - I have to say that having followed your edits and specifically your picture uploads on this wiki for a while (not everything on the wiki needs to be redone--focus on things that are actually in need of pictures because there are actually *none*, rather than replacing everything with often dodgy images that aren't really well-thought-out or interesting), I have noticed that your sense of what a well-framed, non-awkward (attractive), iconic or noteworthy image is is something I practically never agree with you on. This is one such example. Your preferred image has the hair cut off (Matt looks better with more of his hair in view) and it's simply not epic enough. And he's not even looking towards the camera, he's looking slightly to the left. He's not doing a bugged-out Tom Baker publicity shot with the eyes straight ahead or the Terrifying Pertwee face/Dracula cape (now those are obvious publicity shots). And NOBODY is going to confuse this image for anything but a screencap. It's close to being a hero shot, which are actually really good images for this sort of thing. Most of these images have Matt's face scrunched up or in motion expressions (avoid them!). Screencaps sometimes do have the actor looking straight ahead (which this actually isn't). The fact that #11 also lights up his eyes is another plus. [[User:NileQT87|NileQT87]] <sup>[[User talk:NileQT87|talk to me]]</sup> 13:05, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | :::: #11 is clearly the best image of the lot. It's brightly lit, perfectly framed, NOT out-of-universe (seriously?) and just the best one. @OttselSpy25 - I have to say that having followed your edits and specifically your picture uploads on this wiki for a while (not everything on the wiki needs to be redone--focus on things that are actually in need of pictures because there are actually *none*, rather than replacing everything with often dodgy images that aren't really well-thought-out or interesting), I have noticed that your sense of what a well-framed, non-awkward (attractive), iconic or noteworthy image is is something I practically never agree with you on. This is one such example. Your preferred image has the hair cut off (Matt looks better with more of his hair in view) and it's simply not epic enough. And he's not even looking towards the camera, he's looking slightly to the left. He's not doing a bugged-out Tom Baker publicity shot with the eyes straight ahead or the Terrifying Pertwee face/Dracula cape (now those are obvious publicity shots). And NOBODY is going to confuse this image for anything but a screencap. It's close to being a hero shot, which are actually really good images for this sort of thing. Most of these images have Matt's face scrunched up or in motion expressions (avoid them!). Screencaps sometimes do have the actor looking straight ahead (which this actually isn't). The fact that #11 also lights up his eyes is another plus. [[User:NileQT87|NileQT87]] <sup>[[User talk:NileQT87|talk to me]]</sup> 13:05, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Image 11 does not actually look at the camera, just by looking at the image, it is obvious to tell that it is left. The chances of an edit war, it very low. If we did, all we had to do was say is "it's not' and that be it. | |||
:Simply, it does, in no way look like a promotional image and in not way at all, is he looking at the camera. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 14:52, April 22, 2012 (UTC) | |||
