765,429
edits
Talk:Near-human: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff
No edit summary |
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Nope, I just added it for convenience. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 14:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)>- | :Nope, I just added it for convenience. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 14:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)>- | ||
::I find it hard to believe that the term has ''never'' been used anywhere in the great body of DW fiction. I don't know of an instance offhand, but surely it must've been used in some novel or BFA. The problem with the article, though, is the way in which some part of the DWU has defined the difference between a near-human and a humanoid, so if anyone comes across a reference, please list it here. It's hard to know what species to include in the article if we don't have a valid defintion from canon. Personally, I think it's that a near human is someone who is externally indistinguishable from a human, so even those with slight differences, like Logopolitans and Futurekind, aren't near-human. But I don't really have any DWU ref to back that up. So I just quietly removed those two species from the article, pending the discovery of a definition that allows them back in. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | ::I find it hard to believe that the term has ''never'' been used anywhere in the great body of DW fiction. I don't know of an instance offhand, but surely it must've been used in some novel or BFA. The problem with the article, though, is the way in which some part of the DWU has defined the difference between a near-human and a humanoid, so if anyone comes across a reference, please list it here. It's hard to know what species to include in the article if we don't have a valid defintion from canon. Personally, I think it's that a near human is someone who is externally indistinguishable from a human, so even those with slight differences, like Logopolitans and Futurekind, aren't near-human. But I don't really have any DWU ref to back that up. So I just quietly removed those two species from the article, pending the discovery of a definition that allows them back in. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}'''17:12:09 Mon '''13 Jun 2011 </span> | ||
==Unnecessary image== | ==Unnecessary image== | ||
