19
edits
Talk:Near-human: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Unnecessary image== | ==Unnecessary image== | ||
I removed the image of Sarah Jane as unnecessary as the article is about near-humans. Having her there not only confuses the issue, but suggests at first glance that Sarah is herself near-human, which isn't the case. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 19:21, January 8, 2010 (UTC) | I removed the image of Sarah Jane as unnecessary as the article is about near-humans. Having her there not only confuses the issue, but suggests at first glance that Sarah is herself near-human, which isn't the case. [[User:23skidoo|23skidoo]] 19:21, January 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Opinion: About this cliché == | |||
This is, in my honest opinion, the single WORST cliché in D.W, if not in all of science fiction. The idea that an almost identical humanoid organism could independently evolve on another planet is ludicrous. It's fine if there is ''some'' distinction (such as star trek's klingons or the time-lord's internal ability to re-incarnate) but if they look 100% identical such as the [[Drahvin|Drahvins]] or the [[Segonaxian|Segonaxians]] it is absolutely in-excusable. In fact, I think one of the un-written rules of sci-fi should be that all alien races should have at least '''SOME''' distinction between humans, either internally or externally. Who agrees? - [[User:Tehtumpi|Tehtumpi]] <sup>[[User talk:Tehtumpi|talk to me]]</sup> 22:38, December 24, 2011 (UTC) | |||
