68,299
edits
Forum:Nominations for featured articles: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
reply
(Long Reply is Long.) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:With the Featured Article, we at the wiki have a chance to show people something that they might not normally look at. A story they haven't seen, an actor they don't know much about, heck, a crew member for the show who doesn't get the props they deserve (If we had good enough articles on some of them... Originally I was wanting to do one of the music composers for the show, but the articles weren't fleshed out enough to warrant it.). | :With the Featured Article, we at the wiki have a chance to show people something that they might not normally look at. A story they haven't seen, an actor they don't know much about, heck, a crew member for the show who doesn't get the props they deserve (If we had good enough articles on some of them... Originally I was wanting to do one of the music composers for the show, but the articles weren't fleshed out enough to warrant it.). | ||
:That is my viewpoint on it. Your mileage may vary. --Colleyd 17:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Woof. | :That is my viewpoint on it. Your mileage may vary. --Colleyd 17:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Woof. | ||
::I some what prefer Colleyd's methods than what we're up to at the moment (though what we're doing at the moment with the voting, changing, deciding is at least showing changes and fixes to the articles that had minor problems). Colleyd's is a more fluid system, which is good until the [[Tardis:Nominations for featured articles|current system]] gets up to full speed ...and votes for something. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 17:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
