Forum:Nominations for featured articles: Difference between revisions

Forum:Nominations for featured articles (edit)

934 bytes added , 30 July 2008

no edit summary

756

edits

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 ::I some what prefer Colleyd's methods than what we're up to at the moment (though what we're doing at the moment with the voting, changing, deciding is at least showing changes and fixes to the articles that had minor problems). Colleyd's is a more fluid system, which is good until the [[Tardis:Nominations for featured articles|current system]] gets up to full speed ...and votes for something. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 17:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
+:::Agreed, if anything, the nominations has at least pointed out things in articles that need refinement and work, so some good has come out of it. I still think voting is a bit silly, but in all fairness, a nomination page would be rather useful.
+:::Like Tangerineduel said, it's showing where articles can be refined and made better. That's a big plus because it betters the wiki, which is always a good thing.
+:::Also, in  all truthfulness, there's been a couple times when looking to pick a FA, that I was a bit stumped. A page of articles people have nominated would be rather handy for situations like that. Nice list of choices. Though right now it looks like the nominations are currently all villians, and since Davros was last month, personaly I'd like to see something different for the change at the end of August. Though, with that in mind, I believe I shall make a nomination. --Colleyd 18:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Woof.