16
edits
Talk:Steven Moffat: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by TheDoctor69 (talk | block) to last version by Shambala108) |
TheDoctor69 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
(I am [[Special:Contributions/173.180.24.7|173.180.24.7]] but changed address) [[Special:Contributions/173.180.191.120|173.180.191.120]] 05:29, January 10, 2011 (UTC) | (I am [[Special:Contributions/173.180.24.7|173.180.24.7]] but changed address) [[Special:Contributions/173.180.191.120|173.180.191.120]] 05:29, January 10, 2011 (UTC) | ||
----Is there a more unbiased way to moderate?---- | |||
Hi guys, so I've had a post removed twice now (removed now NOT hidden so no record of the post will exist except on my profile) by moderator Shambala108. I have requested both a second opinion by a different moderator and an acceptable explanation from Shambala108 her/himself and neither has been provided, if this wasss to be provided im sure I could re-word my post so it no longer breaches the rules. I'm curious if we can come up with a more unbiased way of reviewing posts etc that's not based on a solitary opinion of in individual user who could in all fairness be just 12-18!!!? we should have at least two mods concur on a decision before being able to affect someone elses postings which in turn wont be publicized until reviewed!! | |||
Anyone who agreed private mail me. You will note no spoilers or comments which contravene the wiki rules here so there should be no reason to pull this one down. | |||
