Talk:Steven Moffat: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:
----Is there a more unbiased way to moderate?----
----Is there a more unbiased way to moderate?----


Hi guys, so I've had a post removed twice now (removed now NOT hidden so no record of the post will exist except on my profile) by moderator Shambala108. I have requested both a second opinion by a different moderator and an acceptable explanation from  Shambala108 her/himself and neither has been provided, if this wasss to be provided im sure I could re-word my post so it no longer breaches the rules. I'm curious if we can come up with a more unbiased way of reviewing posts etc that's not based on a solitary opinion of in individual user who could in all fairness be just 12-18!!!? we should have at least two mods concur on a decision before being able to affect someone elses postings which in turn wont be publicized until reviewed!!
Hi guys, so I've had a post removed twice now (removed now NOT hidden so no record of the post will no longer exist except on my profile history) by moderator Shambala108. I have requested both a second opinion by a different moderator and an acceptable explanation from  Shambala108 her/himself and neither has been provided, if this wasss to be provided im sure I could re-word my post so it no longer breaches the rules. I'm curious if we can come up with a more unbiased way of reviewing posts etc that's not based on a solitary opinion of in individual user who could in all fairness be just 12-18!!!? we should have at least two mods concur on a decision before being able to affect someone elses postings which in turn wont be publicized until reviewed!!


Anyone who agreed private mail me. You will note no spoilers or comments which contravene the wiki rules here so there should be no reason to pull this one down.
Anyone who agreed private mail me. You will note no spoilers or comments which contravene the wiki rules here so there should be no reason to pull this one down.
16

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.