emailconfirmed, Administrators
129,644
edits
Theory talk:Timeline - Romana: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Duplication of effort
No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Actually, Romana has quite a number of audio stories that don't feature a Doctor, so unlike the case with J&G, who mostly appear together, I think this page is justified. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:01, July 22, 2016 (UTC) | :Actually, Romana has quite a number of audio stories that don't feature a Doctor, so unlike the case with J&G, who mostly appear together, I think this page is justified. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:01, July 22, 2016 (UTC) | ||
::I didn't say there weren't Romana stories without the Doctor. All her non-Doctor stories already go on the Time Lords timeline page, and her timeline had always been synchronous with Gallifrey's. [[User:Fwhiffahder|Fwhiffahder]] [[User talk:Fwhiffahder|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:09, July 23, 2016 (UTC) | ::I didn't say there weren't Romana stories without the Doctor. All her non-Doctor stories already go on the Time Lords timeline page, and her timeline had always been synchronous with Gallifrey's. [[User:Fwhiffahder|Fwhiffahder]] [[User talk:Fwhiffahder|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:09, July 23, 2016 (UTC) | ||
::::Considering that most of these timeline pages are for individuals rather than species, and we have a separate page for the Rani, who to date has fewer appearances than Romana, I see no reason to get rid of Romana's page. If you're worried about duplication of effort, I'd be more likely to get rid of the Time Lords page instead. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 00:51, July 23, 2016 (UTC) | |||
