Trusted
34,027
edits
User talk:109.151.95.119: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Edit war
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Please do not revert my edits to [[Veritas]] any further. There is no connection between this species and [[the Monks]] seen in the latest episode of ''Doctor Who''. Please do not start an edit war over this, as per [[Tardis:Vandalism policy]] this is too against our policies. Thank you. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:35, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | Please do not revert my edits to [[Veritas]] any further. There is no connection between this species and [[the Monks]] seen in the latest episode of ''Doctor Who''. Please do not start an edit war over this, as per [[Tardis:Vandalism policy]] this is too against our policies. Thank you. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:35, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | :Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also ''deleted'' a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't ''continuously'' re-add the half which was directly challenged. It ''is'' vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before ''adding it all again'' just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply ''not re-added the content which was challenged'' while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to | :: Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also ''deleted'' a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't ''continuously'' re-add the half which was directly challenged. It ''is'' vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before ''adding it all again'' just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply ''not re-added the content which was challenged'' while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
