User talk:109.151.95.119: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Edit war
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | :Do not delete every single piece of an editors work just because they'd made a mistake, a worked on the existing content too - correcting it to ensure that it was more understandable. You coming along and bulldozing everything is, in my opinion, vandalism too. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:38, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also ''deleted'' a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't ''continuously'' re-add the half which was directly challenged. It ''is'' vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before ''adding it all again'' just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply ''not re-added the content which was challenged'' while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | :: Yea, but it's not really though. All I did was undo your edit which not only added speculation, but also ''deleted'' a rename template. I would ask that if you truly believe in the future that half of an edit was fine for policy that you didn't ''continuously'' re-add the half which was directly challenged. It ''is'' vandalism to agree with me that some of what you added was speculation before ''adding it all again'' just to prove a point. For each time you reverted the edits of other users removing the speculatory content and re-adding the tag, you could have simply ''not re-added the content which was challenged'' while adding all of the other stuff. Instead, you left it up to others to clean-up your work over-and-over again for little reason. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 10:49, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::I don't agree with you. You claim that the Monks and the Veritas have nothing in common... despite the fact that they look like each other, wear the same red robes, etc, but I'm not going to go into a big rant about it as I know you wouldn't care and would continue to erase my work. I just wanted my hard work that I knew wouldn't be disputed to be saved. The deletion of the re-name tag was completely accidental when I created the infobox. [[Special:Contributions/109.151.95.119|109.151.95.119]]<sup>[[User talk:109.151.95.119#top|talk to me]]</sup> 10:53, May 21, 2017 (UTC) | |||
