2,583
edits
Talk:Dalek Exploding in Slow Motion (webcast): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:Dalek Exploding in Slow Motion (webcast) (edit)
Revision as of 10:53, 24 April 2020
, 24 April 2020→Should this be VALID?
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::I put an invalid tag on it. If someone really wants to argue the point, do not do so here, but take it to the forums. However, I will point out that it's pretty clear this is behind the scenes, and it would take some heavy convincing to change the ruling. And I've said this before, but please in the future take this type of question to the forums. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:08, April 23, 2020 (UTC) | ::::I put an invalid tag on it. If someone really wants to argue the point, do not do so here, but take it to the forums. However, I will point out that it's pretty clear this is behind the scenes, and it would take some heavy convincing to change the ruling. And I've said this before, but please in the future take this type of question to the forums. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:08, April 23, 2020 (UTC) | ||
I know this already invalid, but I just wanna say that I saw this doubling as joke ‘take that’ video similar to Graham Norton getting exterminated. I don’t think it’s a coincidence they chose at that point retired but nigh-universally hated Victory design (well, technically that’s an Asylum ‘redux’ version of the Victory design, which personally I like, but whatevs, as the cool kids say). But the point is I wouldn’t call it valid no matter how one spins it. I can (just about) see the argument for it passing rule one, although I personally disagree, but I can’t see anything suggesting it comes even close to even touching rule 4. [[User:NightmareofEden|NightmareofEden]] [[User talk:NightmareofEden|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:51, April 24, 2020 (UTC) | I know this is now already invalid, but I just wanna say that I saw this doubling as joke ‘take that’ video similar to Graham Norton getting exterminated. I don’t think it’s a coincidence they chose at that point retired but nigh-universally hated Victory design (well, technically that’s an Asylum ‘redux’ version of the Victory design, which personally I like, but whatevs, as the cool kids say). But the point is I wouldn’t call it valid no matter how one spins it. I can (just about) see the argument for it passing rule one, although I personally disagree, but I can’t see anything suggesting it comes even close to even touching rule 4. [[User:NightmareofEden|NightmareofEden]] [[User talk:NightmareofEden|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 10:51, April 24, 2020 (UTC) | ||
