Tech, Bureaucrats, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators, threadmoderator
113,605
edits
Talk:River Song: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Human vs Proto-Time Lord
| Line 258: | Line 258: | ||
:If there is any contradiction between sources, we should be listing "Human, Time Lord, Proto-Time Lord" to allow for what both sources are telling us. If it's simply a matter of the species being ''named'' afterwards in another source, just "Proto-Time Lord" is fine, if we're certain that she wasn't human before Kovarian's experiments. If there's been a change of species in her lifetime, both Human and Proto-Time Lord need to be listed.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:23, July 13, 2020 (UTC) | :If there is any contradiction between sources, we should be listing "Human, Time Lord, Proto-Time Lord" to allow for what both sources are telling us. If it's simply a matter of the species being ''named'' afterwards in another source, just "Proto-Time Lord" is fine, if we're certain that she wasn't human before Kovarian's experiments. If there's been a change of species in her lifetime, both Human and Proto-Time Lord need to be listed.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:23, July 13, 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Although if, as I suspect, Proto-Time Lords only applies to the clones created by Kovarian from River's embryonic DNA, then she should only be listed as human and Time Lord. We know that these clone batches were the result of her experiments and we know that she made some alterations at least to affect their behaviour. River was an earlier experiment, which failed in Kovarian's view. I suggest we re-listen to the audio stories in question for better context.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 04:32, July 13, 2020 (UTC) | |||
