2,576
edits
No edit summary |
(→Name) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Historically we haven't actually needed confirmation of the "Numberth Doctor" form to use it without a conjecture tag. As pointed out by [[User:Borisashton]] in the ''Curse'' debate, the Eccleston [[Ninth Doctor]] wasn't confirmed as the "ninth Doctor" (let alone "the Ninth Doctor") until [[Series 3 (Doctor Who)|Series 3]] — and I'm not actually sure we yet have a source officially calling Whittaker "the [[Thirteenth Doctor]]" in so many words. Certainly we didn't back in 2017, and yet that doesn't mean we put a conjecture tag on ''her'' article. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:39, October 3, 2020 (UTC) | :Historically we haven't actually needed confirmation of the "Numberth Doctor" form to use it without a conjecture tag. As pointed out by [[User:Borisashton]] in the ''Curse'' debate, the Eccleston [[Ninth Doctor]] wasn't confirmed as the "ninth Doctor" (let alone "the Ninth Doctor") until [[Series 3 (Doctor Who)|Series 3]] — and I'm not actually sure we yet have a source officially calling Whittaker "the [[Thirteenth Doctor]]" in so many words. Certainly we didn't back in 2017, and yet that doesn't mean we put a conjecture tag on ''her'' article. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:39, October 3, 2020 (UTC) | ||
I only added it because of the wording of the article "an individual who would logically have been called...", but you do make a point there. However, Epsilon also make a point about calling them what the credits identified them as.... hmmm.... 🤔 [[User:NightmareofEden|NightmareofEden]] [[User talk:NightmareofEden|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:45, October 3, 2020 (UTC) |
edits