2,539
edits
Talk:The Concept of War (novel): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Investigation
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
::::: I never meant that it being an ebook was suspicious, but the circumstances of the oddly limited release of the book, and then the absurd ''price'' of said ebook. | ::::: I never meant that it being an ebook was suspicious, but the circumstances of the oddly limited release of the book, and then the absurd ''price'' of said ebook. | ||
::::: Hey, if poor quality of writing would be grounds for the story not to be covered, I'd be actively campaigning for the removal of the ''[[Dr. Fifth (novel)|Dr. Fifth]]'', seeing as it's a poor copy of ''[[Castrovalva (TV story)|Castrovalva]]''. I was merely noting the apparent quality of ''The Concept of War'' felt weird as, considering how the first story in the series would be like that, but I would never want it in a million years to be the rationale for it to be kicked off the Wiki. '''[[User:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><tt>Epsilon</tt></span>]]''' '''[[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:gold"><tt><sup><u>''Contact me!''</u></sup></tt></span>]]''' 15:35, October 27, 2020 (UTC) | ::::: Hey, if poor quality of writing would be grounds for the story not to be covered, I'd be actively campaigning for the removal of the ''[[Dr. Fifth (novel)|Dr. Fifth]]'', seeing as it's a poor copy of ''[[Castrovalva (TV story)|Castrovalva]]''. I was merely noting the apparent quality of ''The Concept of War'' felt weird as, considering how the first story in the series would be like that, but I would never want it in a million years to be the rationale for it to be kicked off the Wiki. '''[[User:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><tt>Epsilon</tt></span>]]''' '''[[User talk:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:gold"><tt><sup><u>''Contact me!''</u></sup></tt></span>]]''' 15:35, October 27, 2020 (UTC) | ||
As for why it said “only source is invalid”, that EXACT WORDING was used to delete pages related to this story, that is to say, elements from it such as [[The Curious Incident of David Cameron and the Pig in the Night Time]] (lol, by the way), so it seems it may have been a simple error caused but muscle memory to put that summary here (although, to clarify, the actual deletion of the page was obviously deliberate). Talking of links, [[Num be r Two]], which appears to be referring to the The Prisoner character, actually links to a page on some Dalek from a comic... so... there’s that. As for that references section, it’s really weird. If all this stuff actually happens in the book, it’s one a wild eight-page book! Not least that bit about how Sherlock Holmes actually founded new Labour. Honestly, this page itself is even less coherent than the ebook excerpt. [[User:NightmareofEden|NightmareofEden]] [[User talk:NightmareofEden|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 16:30, October 27, 2020 (UTC) | |||
