Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,060
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
: The anthology very likely contains connective tissue too, but information about said stories is scarce (as was originally the case for the series as a whole) and that section is open for others to freely develop themselves. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | : The anthology very likely contains connective tissue too, but information about said stories is scarce (as was originally the case for the series as a whole) and that section is open for others to freely develop themselves. [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:20, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: I think it would be silly not to include everything, as it's probable most of it contains something we've missed, as sometimes, things aren't all that overt. And by the way, [[User:Najawin|Najawin]], your words are appreciated. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><tt>Epsilon</tt></span>]]''' '''[[doctor who:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 01:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | :: I think it would be silly not to include everything, as it's probable most of it contains something we've missed, as sometimes, things aren't all that overt. And by the way, [[User:Najawin|Najawin]], your words are appreciated. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><tt>Epsilon</tt></span>]]''' '''[[doctor who:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 01:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:: Hello. Me again. | |||
:: As I have said before, the decision that we do not cover ''Brenda and Effie'' as a whole was made ''irrespective'' of the presence of DWU characters in it; and indeed the thread acknowledged that ''The Bride That Time Forgot'' may be deserving of an individual inclusion debate as a crossover, which simply never materialised, even if the rest of the series was to be deemed out-of-bounds. In ''no way'' does it constitute precedent that appearances by other DWU characters in non-''B&E''-branded stories can be "too tenuous". @[[User:PoolsideJazz|PoolsideJazz]], much as Najawin said might be the case, I'd caution you to lay off that line of argument lest you fall afoul of the spirit of [[T:POINT]]. | |||
:: However… @[[User:Najawin]], I'm actually not against shortening this page for the moment if anybody else agrees. It's not as though the work will be lost; when (and it's more of a when than an if) we officially decide to give ''Brenda and Effie'' more coverage, we can just go back to the old revision. I would support removing the overly detailed information ''not'' mentioning DWU connections ''for the time being'', in the spirit of proper procedure. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC) |