Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
37,249
edits
Talk:The Brenda and Effie Mysteries (series): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Talk:The Brenda and Effie Mysteries (series) (edit)
Revision as of 01:27, 31 January 2021
, 31 January 2021no edit summary
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:: As I have said before, the decision that we do not cover ''Brenda and Effie'' as a whole was made ''irrespective'' of the presence of DWU characters in it; and indeed the thread acknowledged that ''The Bride That Time Forgot'' may be deserving of an individual inclusion debate as a crossover, which simply never materialised, even if the rest of the series was to be deemed out-of-bounds. In ''no way'' does it constitute precedent that appearances by other DWU characters in non-''B&E''-branded stories can be "too tenuous". @[[User:PoolsideJazz|PoolsideJazz]], much as Najawin said might be the case, I'd caution you to lay off that line of argument lest you fall afoul of the spirit of [[T:POINT]]. | :: As I have said before, the decision that we do not cover ''Brenda and Effie'' as a whole was made ''irrespective'' of the presence of DWU characters in it; and indeed the thread acknowledged that ''The Bride That Time Forgot'' may be deserving of an individual inclusion debate as a crossover, which simply never materialised, even if the rest of the series was to be deemed out-of-bounds. In ''no way'' does it constitute precedent that appearances by other DWU characters in non-''B&E''-branded stories can be "too tenuous". @[[User:PoolsideJazz|PoolsideJazz]], much as Najawin said might be the case, I'd caution you to lay off that line of argument lest you fall afoul of the spirit of [[T:POINT]]. | ||
:: However… @[[User:Najawin]], I'm actually not against shortening this page for the moment if anybody else agrees. It's not as though the work will be lost; when (and it's more of a when than an if) we officially decide to give ''Brenda and Effie'' more coverage, we can just go back to the old revision. I would support removing the overly detailed information ''not'' mentioning DWU connections ''for the time being'', in the spirit of proper procedure. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | :: However… @[[User:Najawin]], I'm actually not against shortening this page for the moment if anybody else agrees. It's not as though the work will be lost; when (and it's more of a when than an if) we officially decide to give ''Brenda and Effie'' more coverage, we can just go back to the old revision. I would support removing the overly detailed information ''not'' mentioning DWU connections ''for the time being'', in the spirit of proper procedure. | ||
:: Also, a point of terminology: basically, '''"covered" in Wiki-policy-talk means we have in-universe page about something's fictional contents'''. Obviously, in plain English, to even ''have'' the page [[The Brenda and Effie Mysteries (series)]], or, for that matter, [[Star Trek]], is to give those series some "coverage", but that's not how we use the term. [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 01:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
