Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,060
edits
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: I 100% agree with BCM here. And this is why we usually take an abundance of caution when covering ongoing story or series, a sensible approach which has been decidedly lacking during the coverage of this season... (See: [[Special:Diff/2826878|Soto's edit summary on 'O']] from between Parts 1 & 2 of Spyfall, for an example) [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | ::: I 100% agree with BCM here. And this is why we usually take an abundance of caution when covering ongoing story or series, a sensible approach which has been decidedly lacking during the coverage of this season... (See: [[Special:Diff/2826878|Soto's edit summary on 'O']] from between Parts 1 & 2 of Spyfall, for an example) [[User:Danochy|Danochy]] [[User talk:Danochy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:47, 30 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: I'm of course willing to reconsider the original rationale above, but I reject the accusation that it was "rash" in a sense of failing to account for later episodes. The idea that the Division might recruit other species has been around since ''Halloween Apocalypse'' itself ([[Karvanista|hello]]!), and instead was the grounds for my not being willing to categorise [[K-Toscs]] as a Time Lord, unlike En Sentac. The question is whether "agent of an organisation known to employ Time Lords, who is thousands of years old and whose absorbed life-force allows someone to regenerate" constitutes sufficient telegraphing that En Sentac specifically is a Time Lord, not whether Division agents are ''necessarily'' Time Lords in the abstract. <span style="color: #baa3d6;font-family:Comic Sans;">[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']]</span> <span style="color: #baa3d6;">[[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]]</span> 14:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC) |