Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Theory:Doctor Who television discontinuity and plot holes/Blink (edit)
Revision as of 06:51, 25 April 2010
, 25 April 2010no edit summary
(Split up a few cases where multiple replies were crammed into one paragraph because of the limitations of the old format, and added a few replies) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
*Why didn't Sally and Larry simply keep one eye open thus allowing them to keep an eye on the Angels whilst at the same time giving them the opportunity to rest the closed eye and switch eyes when needed? | *Why didn't Sally and Larry simply keep one eye open thus allowing them to keep an eye on the Angels whilst at the same time giving them the opportunity to rest the closed eye and switch eyes when needed? | ||
::They are clearly scared, and the thought of using one eye at a time probably wouldn't have occurred to them. It's also more physically challenging than it sounds, given the automatic aspect of blinking. | ::They are clearly scared, and the thought of using one eye at a time probably wouldn't have occurred to them. It's also more physically challenging than it sounds, given the automatic aspect of blinking. | ||
::Interestingly, this is the first thing Amy tries. Because she's amazingly clever, or because Moffat hadn't thought of that a few years ago but has since then (or because some fan asked him in the intervening time) Anyway, watching her, you can see how difficult it is. Try it yourself. | |||
*With DI Billy Shipton zapped back to 1969 and dying in 2007, wouldn't it have been possible for his older and younger versions to run into each other between 1969 and 2007? | *With DI Billy Shipton zapped back to 1969 and dying in 2007, wouldn't it have been possible for his older and younger versions to run into each other between 1969 and 2007? | ||
