Forum:Temporary forums/IU DAB Terms: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/IU DAB Terms (edit)
Revision as of 07:32, 22 February 2023
, 22 February 2023Added support
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
(Added support) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:: And I do think the specificity in DABBING is the best route. ''The Seeds of Doom (in-universe novel)'' and ''The Seeds of Doom (in-universe serial)'' both sounds fine to me. But are we all also fine with ''Who Killed Kennedy (in-universe novel)''? Or does the mere ''intention'' of the original media to also exist in-universe provide an exception here? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 21:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC) | :: And I do think the specificity in DABBING is the best route. ''The Seeds of Doom (in-universe novel)'' and ''The Seeds of Doom (in-universe serial)'' both sounds fine to me. But are we all also fine with ''Who Killed Kennedy (in-universe novel)''? Or does the mere ''intention'' of the original media to also exist in-universe provide an exception here? [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 21:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Personally I'd slightly prefer the dab "(in-universe)" to "(in-universe THING)", because it makes for less dab terms and, more importantly, avoids discussion of ''what'' a certain in-universe element is, and I just prefer it for reasons I cannot explain. But if people prefer "(in-universe THING)", I'm perfectly happy to go with that, much ''much'' more than our current policies. I think the most dangerous part of our current policies is that there are many in-universe versions of novels which are ''undabbed''. '''I support'''' [[Special:Contributions/217.163.63.65|217.163.63.65]]<sup>[[User talk:217.163.63.65#top|talk to me]]</sup> 07:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
