Trusted
8,512
edits
(Added support) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
: Personally I'd slightly prefer the dab "(in-universe)" to "(in-universe THING)", because it makes for less dab terms and, more importantly, avoids discussion of ''what'' a certain in-universe element is, and I just prefer it for reasons I cannot explain. But if people prefer "(in-universe THING)", I'm perfectly happy to go with that, much ''much'' more than our current policies. I think the most dangerous part of our current policies is that there are many in-universe versions of novels which are ''undabbed''. '''I support'''' [[Special:Contributions/217.163.63.65|217.163.63.65]]<sup>[[User talk:217.163.63.65#top|talk to me]]</sup> 07:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC) | : Personally I'd slightly prefer the dab "(in-universe)" to "(in-universe THING)", because it makes for less dab terms and, more importantly, avoids discussion of ''what'' a certain in-universe element is, and I just prefer it for reasons I cannot explain. But if people prefer "(in-universe THING)", I'm perfectly happy to go with that, much ''much'' more than our current policies. I think the most dangerous part of our current policies is that there are many in-universe versions of novels which are ''undabbed''. '''I support'''' [[Special:Contributions/217.163.63.65|217.163.63.65]]<sup>[[User talk:217.163.63.65#top|talk to me]]</sup> 07:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
::What are your thoughts about the fact that there's ''Planet of the Spiders'' as both an episode and book in-universe? [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |