2,240
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity (view source)
Revision as of 22:32, 5 March 2023
, 5 March 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
::::I think this is where my procedural qualms hit their limit. We have ''so much'' prior discussion on video games in the deleted forums that I'm not comfortable supporting any attempts to validate video games without looking at those discussions and seeing if/where they went wrong. I'm '''opposed''' (though I strongly suspect that I would support when I saw those older threads). With that said, I fully expect to be the only person to feel this way. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | ::::I think this is where my procedural qualms hit their limit. We have ''so much'' prior discussion on video games in the deleted forums that I'm not comfortable supporting any attempts to validate video games without looking at those discussions and seeing if/where they went wrong. I'm '''opposed''' (though I strongly suspect that I would support when I saw those older threads). With that said, I fully expect to be the only person to feel this way. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
::::: As someone who was a participant in the ''Legacy'' validity discussion in...2016, I believe it was?...the basis for it being ruled invalid was the claim that you could not separate the gameplay from the story. Which, as OS12 has outlined above, is patently wrong, considering the game itself does so. [[User:Pluto2|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
