Trusted
8,503
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/Legacy validity (view source)
Revision as of 22:42, 5 March 2023
, 5 March 2023→Discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
::::: As someone who was a participant in the ''Legacy'' validity discussion in...2016, I believe it was?...the basis for it being ruled invalid was the claim that you could not separate the gameplay from the story. Which, as OS12 has outlined above, is patently wrong, considering the game itself does so. [[User:Pluto2|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | ::::: As someone who was a participant in the ''Legacy'' validity discussion in...2016, I believe it was?...the basis for it being ruled invalid was the claim that you could not separate the gameplay from the story. Which, as OS12 has outlined above, is patently wrong, considering the game itself does so. [[User:Pluto2|Pluto2]][[User talk:Pluto2|<span title="talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
I'm not disputing anything said in the post. I fully believe that OS12 reported the discussion as best they could recall it. (And I fully expect that the reasoning was something ridiculous like that.) It's a procedural qualm. I don't feel comfortable validating ''any'' video game given our extensive discussion of them and continued rejection of them, with all of that discussion taking place in the now gone forums. Other discussions have made me uncomfortable on procedural grounds, but this is just a bit too much for me to support. Again, I think I'm the only person who will feel this way. And I expect that it will be ignored. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
