Trusted
8,511
edits
(→Chute!) |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 712: | Line 712: | ||
::: I do admit that I went a little ham with this one, and if I had known how much trouble one or two of these topics would have been, I wouldn't have thrown them in like this. In the future I think I'll stick to 4-5 topics. But the idea of a speedround does not hurt the wiki, it is actually good that every debate we have doesn't fundamentally rewrite the way we're meant to go about things. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] | ::: I do admit that I went a little ham with this one, and if I had known how much trouble one or two of these topics would have been, I wouldn't have thrown them in like this. In the future I think I'll stick to 4-5 topics. But the idea of a speedround does not hurt the wiki, it is actually good that every debate we have doesn't fundamentally rewrite the way we're meant to go about things. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] | ||
::::Politely, it's not trivial that you don't have a policy change in here, as Memes has pointed out. I, again, am not sure that he's correct. But it's not trivial. As for the idea of there being things in a thread that people miss, given you slipped in a ''specific'' crossover into this proposal that we are '''''not supposed to talk about''''' as an "oh, yeah, let's validate this too", well, glass houses, stones, etc. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC) |