225
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Inclusion debates speedround: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Temporary forums/Inclusion debates speedround (view source)
Revision as of 03:12, 14 April 2023
, 14 April 2023→''Doctor Who and the Fangs of Time'' discussion
Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 633: | Line 633: | ||
:: I agree, sorry, I did say that senor 105 is an example I used where rule 4 does work, something with a dwu original character with its own series not dwu, but I've said that if it was the main Doctor and not parody, it's dwu. So Fangs of Time. i agree. DWU. [[Special:Contributions/81.108.82.15|81.108.82.15]]<sup>[[User talk:81.108.82.15#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | :: I agree, sorry, I did say that senor 105 is an example I used where rule 4 does work, something with a dwu original character with its own series not dwu, but I've said that if it was the main Doctor and not parody, it's dwu. So Fangs of Time. i agree. DWU. [[Special:Contributions/81.108.82.15|81.108.82.15]]<sup>[[User talk:81.108.82.15#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
:This one I'm skeptical on. I've read the story, and to me it seems like more a parody akin to ''Doctor Who?'s'' brand of dry whit, written more sentimental but retaining the same parodic "vibe." I get it, we shouldn't use a vibe to judge a story's continuity. But even though it is a mainline comic strip, it's a good indicator for invalidity if it reads as a ''Doctor Who?'' strip rather than any other mainline strip of that decade. Sorry for being the fun police, I really am! I just think we need more discussion on its authorial intent. [[User:LilPotato|LilPotato]] [[User talk:LilPotato|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 03:12, 14 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ''Requiem for Death's Head'' == | == ''Requiem for Death's Head'' == | ||
