Trusted
6,455
edits
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:Deleted Scenes and Rule 4 By Proxy (view source)
Revision as of 15:19, 10 May 2023
, 10 May 2023no edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 308: | Line 308: | ||
::::But, like, yeah, maybe they pass. We don't really have a ton of R3 jurisprudence. Maybe just being able to go read/watch the thing means it passes R3. (And for the closing admin here, note that I do mean maybe in the strictest possible sense, I don't think this is a good position to hold.) But I think that has some counterintuitive implications about old script revisions and such. I just don't see why showing us the scrapped product, a look into what definitively didn't happen, but allowing us more access into the bts production fun, is being treated as on par with an actual released product, even one that's invalid. It seems a category error to me. The product was just never released. What was released was a work print, not an actual product. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC) | ::::But, like, yeah, maybe they pass. We don't really have a ton of R3 jurisprudence. Maybe just being able to go read/watch the thing means it passes R3. (And for the closing admin here, note that I do mean maybe in the strictest possible sense, I don't think this is a good position to hold.) But I think that has some counterintuitive implications about old script revisions and such. I just don't see why showing us the scrapped product, a look into what definitively didn't happen, but allowing us more access into the bts production fun, is being treated as on par with an actual released product, even one that's invalid. It seems a category error to me. The product was just never released. What was released was a work print, not an actual product. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::::Fair enough, I think I agree with you there. You've convinced me that deleted scenes maybe shouldn't be validated due to R3 concerns, although ultimately I'm neutral on this point. However, with P.S., I don't think it actually counts as a deleted scene. I know it was ruled to be one, but policy can be overturned, right? And [[User:OttselSpy25]]'s argument against it being a deleted scene seems pretty convincing: | |||
::::::Because the webcast is depicted as a rotating series of drawings which clearly originated as storyboards, there was speculation that it was a "deleted scene," and that this was originally the ending to [[TV]]: ''[[The Angels Take Manhattan (TV story)|The Angels Take Manhattan]]''. However, writer [[Chris Chibnall]] revealed that the scene was actually intended as a DVD live-action bonus feature. [[Mark Williams]] was not available for filming, so the dialogue was recorded and it was turned into a webcast. Ultimately, in all regards other than the quality of the art, it somewhat resembles the early ''DW'' webcasts, such as [[WC]]: ''[[Shada (webcast)|Shada]]''. | |||
:::::Ultimately, I support saying that P.S is not actually a deleted scene, and I'm now neutral on deleted scenes and R3. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|Aquanafrahudy]] [[User talk:Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
