1,858
edits
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 source edit |
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:::::The only one out of the main proposals I disagree with is probably [[Vastra]]. But I do think the "Sir" angle could be difficult, as there are numerous characters (including [[Ian Chesterton]] and [[Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart]]) who are confirmed to be knighted but not in their first stories. So I think that should be a case-by-case thing. [[Brian the Ood]] being a redirect is a very obvious example of our policy not fitting the reality of coverage. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 19:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC) | :::::The only one out of the main proposals I disagree with is probably [[Vastra]]. But I do think the "Sir" angle could be difficult, as there are numerous characters (including [[Ian Chesterton]] and [[Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart]]) who are confirmed to be knighted but not in their first stories. So I think that should be a case-by-case thing. [[Brian the Ood]] being a redirect is a very obvious example of our policy not fitting the reality of coverage. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]][[User Talk:OttselSpy25|🤙☎️]] 19:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
Najawin - perhaps I didn't properly forumulate my reasons because I saw it as inuitive - does [[Godfather Sabbath]] not look and feel ''much'' better to you than [[Sabbath (Movers)]]? | |||
OS25 - yes, I absolutely agree that we should ''not'' move every character with an honourific. This should be a case-by-case Talk page thing. | |||
Aqauana - yeah, I'm completely ambivalent on the Romana one, just tossed it in their as an extreme example, partially so that people could say no to it now and codify that. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC) |
edits