Trusted
54,551
edits
Forum:Validity: Hacker T. Dog: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
:::I did wonder about this, but I couldn't find anything online; as OS25 has said, a lot of these CBBC segments aren't widely available. Can I ask, Borisashton, how you found the bit immediately following "''The Robot Reveal''"? There doesn't seem to be any information about it that I can find. R4 intent is definitely iffy, but we should certainly cover it nonetheless. Should we also cover all of the bits which B1ink Bot introduces? Probably, but it ''is'' a lot of work, so I'm not entirely sure. I literally cannot find any of this archived, and I don't even know if archives of this stuff exist. It's a complicated topic, certainly. Should the further adventures of B1ink Bot 3 be valid? I have absolutely no idea, however I'm leaning towards validation. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]] 15:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | :::I did wonder about this, but I couldn't find anything online; as OS25 has said, a lot of these CBBC segments aren't widely available. Can I ask, Borisashton, how you found the bit immediately following "''The Robot Reveal''"? There doesn't seem to be any information about it that I can find. R4 intent is definitely iffy, but we should certainly cover it nonetheless. Should we also cover all of the bits which B1ink Bot introduces? Probably, but it ''is'' a lot of work, so I'm not entirely sure. I literally cannot find any of this archived, and I don't even know if archives of this stuff exist. It's a complicated topic, certainly. Should the further adventures of B1ink Bot 3 be valid? I have absolutely no idea, however I'm leaning towards validation. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|📢]] 15:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: Personally, I think that if the further appearances are covered, then they should also be valid. [[User:Cookieboy 2005|Cookieboy 2005]] [[User talk:Cookieboy 2005|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
