Forum:Real world franchises with DWU connections: Qualification speedround: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* '''Every franchise that appears in ''[[Funko Pop! Blitz (video game)|Funko Pop! Blitz]]'''''. A couple of months back, somebody went to that sizeable list of represented franchises at the bottom of the page there, and turned each one into an inactive link, with the clear intention for franchise pages to be created. …I went in and removed the links. The thing is, I'm not entirely sure if it counts as a crossover, when the full extent of their connection to ''Doctor Who'' is "characters from this franchise and ''Doctor Who'' sometimes appear on the game board at the same time"
* '''Every franchise that appears in ''[[Funko Pop! Blitz (video game)|Funko Pop! Blitz]]'''''. A couple of months back, somebody went to that sizeable list of represented franchises at the bottom of the page there, and turned each one into an inactive link, with the clear intention for franchise pages to be created. …I went in and removed the links. The thing is, I'm not entirely sure if it counts as a crossover, when the full extent of their connection to ''Doctor Who'' is "characters from this franchise and ''Doctor Who'' sometimes appear on the game board at the same time"


* '''''LEGO Dimensions'' franchises that don't appear with DW elements in any narrative elements'''. Do we really need a page for, let's say, ''The Powerpuff Girls'', on the basis that "you can play as the Doctor while visiting Townsville"?
* '''''LEGO Dimensions'' franchises that don't appear with DW elements in any narrative elements'''. Do we really need a page for, let's say, ''The Powerpuff Girls'', on the basis that "the Doctor and the Cyberman are among the dozens and dozens of characters you can play as while visiting Townsville"?


* '''''[[Shrek (series)|Shrek]]'''''. This one actually already has a page, as you can see, I'm not 100% sure if it actually qualifies due to a unique grey area that's presented: ''Shrek'' was involved in BBC One's 2012 Christmas campaign, ''[[It's Showtime (TV story)|It's Showtime]]''. Now, in terms of the campaign as a whole, Shrek himself does appear in one of the idents, suggesting a licensing agreement that makes this an official usage. But when it comes to the promo, the thing that we actually cover due it its usage of DW elements, Shrek's appearance is only ''implied''; he's presented as apparently being inside a trailer at the BBC studio, where he shoots a large blob of green snot from offscreen. Would you say that counts as an "appearance"?
* '''''[[Shrek (series)|Shrek]]'''''. This one actually already has a page, as you can see, I'm not 100% sure if it actually qualifies due to a unique grey area that's presented: ''Shrek'' was involved in BBC One's 2012 Christmas campaign, ''[[It's Showtime (TV story)|It's Showtime]]''. Now, in terms of the campaign as a whole, Shrek himself does appear in one of the idents, suggesting a licensing agreement that makes this an official usage. But when it comes to the promo, the thing that we actually cover due it its usage of DW elements, Shrek's appearance is only ''implied''; he's presented as apparently being inside a trailer at the BBC studio, where he shoots a large blob of green snot from offscreen. Would you say that counts as an "appearance"?
Trusted
24,523

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.