Forum:Coverage/validity: The LEGO Batman Movie: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 39: Line 39:


: Why? Surely Lego Dimensions, a completely separate work by separate writers, has no bearing on the validity of this? [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]]  06:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
: Why? Surely Lego Dimensions, a completely separate work by separate writers, has no bearing on the validity of this? [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]]  06:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
::It's complicated. Suffice it to say that the production team matters as well as just the individual author, and there's the same overall corporate vision. Ish. I'm just gonna grab a random quote from OS25 in the original ''LEGO Batman'' thread.
:::I will '''''never''''' stop bring up Lego Dimensions because, for the billionth time, it being invalid doesn't meant that it doesn't exist. We ''do not'' need to prove from an in-universe perspective that that the Daleks aren't from a universe where they're a toy. All that we need to prove is the ''authorial context'' for why they included the Daleks and their logic.
:::The fact is, Lego Dimensions does count for the people making the LEGO films.
::It's really just a headache that we're better off taking in the right order. It's still going to give everyone migraines, but it will hopefully end with conceptual clarity, rather than just more confusion. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 07:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Trusted
8,499

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.