Trusted
24,418
edits
Forum:References/Notes/Continuity: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Forum:References/Notes/Continuity (view source)
Revision as of 12:59, 5 September 2023
, 5 September 2023no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
== Opening == | == Opening == | ||
This is gonna be a quick one because I ''was'' going to bring up in "References to Worldbuilding", but that thread has already been locked, so… | This is gonna be a quick one because I ''was'' going to bring it up in "References to Worldbuilding", but that thread has already been locked, so… | ||
I always found the ordering of our pages' References, Notes, and Continuity sections to be kind of illogical. References and Continuity are typically about the in-universe stuff, while Notes are facts about the stories themselves, right? So why is Notes sandwiched between the other two? Surely a more logical progression would be References > Continuity > Notes? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC) | I always found the ordering of our pages' References, Notes, and Continuity sections to be kind of illogical. References and Continuity are typically about the in-universe stuff, while Notes are facts about the stories themselves, right? So why is Notes sandwiched between the other two? Surely a more logical progression would be References > Continuity > Notes? [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
