Forum:Coverage/validity: In the Domain of the Daleks: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 6: Line 6:
==Discussion==
==Discussion==
Yeah, I think this'd definitely qualify for valid coverage. I'm not quite sure how it where you'd cover it, though. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">šŸ“¢</span>]]Ā  20:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I think this'd definitely qualify for valid coverage. I'm not quite sure how it where you'd cover it, though. [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">šŸ“¢</span>]]Ā  20:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
: Sure it's a work of fiction. Why wouldn't it be? It'sā€¦ rather more difficult to figure out what the ''medium'' is, which would be rather necessary whether it's valid or invalid. "(game)"? [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|āŠ•]] 20:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Tech, emailconfirmed, Administrators
38,202

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.