40,416
edits
User talk:Epsilon/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Non-valid Continuity sections, categories, and prefixes question: new section
(→RE: Poetry: new section) Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 436: | Line 436: | ||
Yes, I had thought that too, but I looked at other poems on the wiki and presumably they hadn't been changed yet. Thanks :) [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 18:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC) | Yes, I had thought that too, but I looked at other poems on the wiki and presumably they hadn't been changed yet. Thanks :) [[User:Aquanafrahudy|<span style="font-family: serif; color: pink" title="Hallo." > Aquanafrahudy</span>]] [[User talk: Aquanafrahudy|<span title="Talk to me">📢</span>]] 18:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Non-valid Continuity sections, categories, and prefixes question == | |||
Why, hello. | |||
I wanted to ask if you could help me with something. I've been trying to find the new policy that dictates that continuity sections are now to be written with an out of universe perspective going forward, mainly because I plan to challenge it on the grounds that the continuity section references in-universe events, but I can't find anything specific within [[Forum:Non-valid Continuity sections, categories, and prefixes]]. Since you are the main advocate for the policy, I was hoping you could give me the abridged version of this forum, focusing on the parts relevant to how continuity sections are addressed, to help me understand and maybe come around to this new line of thinking. | |||
Thank you for your time, | |||
Sincerely, | |||
[[User:BananaClownMan|BananaClownMan]] [[User talk:BananaClownMan|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
