68,299
edits
Forum:Discontinuity revisited: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→Formatting
| Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
::But, even if that's not as good as a real outline, it's still better than a bullet. If I know I'm looking for top-level #2 instead of #1-#4, seeing a 2 instead of a 4 immediately tells me I'm looking in the right place. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 02:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ::But, even if that's not as good as a real outline, it's still better than a bullet. If I know I'm looking for top-level #2 instead of #1-#4, seeing a 2 instead of a 4 immediately tells me I'm looking in the right place. --[[User:Falcotron|Falcotron]] 02:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, I think that's good too. I just think that each point should be individually identifiable. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:20, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ::Yeah, I think that's good too. I just think that each point should be individually identifiable. [[User:The Thirteenth Doctor|The Thirteenth Doctor]] 12:20, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Yes, that likely be useful as long as we can make sure everyone follows this system. Rather than going with how talk pages are formatted and indented correctly. (The report writer in me though does say 'counter argument to point 2 should be labelled 2.1, but then that's me obsessing over tiny details). | |||
:::The only issue I have is rolling it out to the 500+ articles some of which have variable formatting which may hamper any automatic change over to this format. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:59, June 2, 2010 (UTC) | |||
